The Armor Games website will be down for maintenance on Monday 10/7/2024
starting at 10:00 AM Pacific time. We apologize for the inconvenience.
The Armor Games website will be down for maintenance on Monday 10/7/2024
starting at 10:00 AM Pacific time. We apologize for the inconvenience.
1486 | 258264 |
im just opening this topic so that people can have a NICE, FREINDLY place to talk about their beliefs, i Myself believe in evolutionism
Show me the evidence that points to a creator creating everything as is instead of things evolving over time without first having a belief in a creator.
So again what evidence do you have for creation?
Provide evidence for creation rather then species evolving. Can you do this?
Do you understand or not?
How open-minded, that's good to know that about you, thanks for sharing. Let me correct that.
@MGW, Do you understand ME or not?
I'm trying to follow this debate but it isn't working so well, what do you want him to understand?
This is STILL going on?! Cheese and rice people!
@samy, He requested my opinion on being a creationist, but doesn't want me to talk about creation. I think it's important to help understand that the universe wasn't created from random chance, but by intention. He doesn't seem to understand how it connects to a creationist's viewpoint against evolution. But intention carries all the way through. Evolution is dependent on random chance, but my creationist viewpoint is dependent on intention. Adaptation without random chance is not evolution, because the same species doesn't change into new ones over time. Evolution depends on random mutations to develop new species that are unable to reproduce with their parent species.
Has any pro-evolutionist really thought about the problem of probability in the number of random DNA mutations that are required to develop a new lifeform? It just can't happen.
Has any pro-evolutionist really thought about the problem of probability in the number of random DNA mutations that are required to develop a new lifeform? It just can't happen.
A study has found that two butterfly species evolved into third.
Hybrid speciation is the process wherein hybridization between two different closely related species leads to a distinct phenotype. This phenotype in rare cases it's fitter than that parental lineage, so natural selection may favor this individuals. Eventually, if reproductive isolation is achieved, it may lead to a separate species.
Has any pro-evolutionist really thought about the problem of probability in the number of random DNA mutations that are required to develop a new lifeform? It just can't happen.
Hybrid speciation is the process wherein hybridization between two different closely related species leads to a distinct phenotype. This phenotype in rare cases it's fitter than that parental lineage, so natural selection may favor this individuals. Eventually, if reproductive isolation is achieved, it may lead to a separate species.
[quote]Has any pro-evolutionist really thought about the problem of probability in the number of random DNA mutations that are required to develop a new lifeform? It just can't happen.
But anyway, what I know is that random DNA mutations are rare, and most that happen are lethal.
And as I said when a biological lifeform reproduces that reproduction isn't a perfect copy. Making mutations being as common as reproduction.
Do I have to break out the evolution video of Stupidity Minute again?
Just so you know, reproduction doesn't involve making DNA mutations, it just involves mixing DNA that's already there.
Thread is locked!