ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Mods Allowed To Count

78431 47048410
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,892 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,431 Replies
SirLegendary
offline
SirLegendary
16,583 posts
Duke

10. I see. I see. I see. A lot of I sees.

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

11. I see the sea that sees all seas.

SirLegendary
offline
SirLegendary
16,583 posts
Duke

12. I threw the letter c in the sea to see if the sea would see to drowning the letter c.

BalkanRenegades
offline
BalkanRenegades
824 posts
Treasurer

13. I think my brain is on fire right now... *faints*

Andelhofs
offline
Andelhofs
743 posts
King

14. time is now, now it is time for..

Eldunari17
offline
Eldunari17
1,229 posts
Scribe

15. Now it is time for...heck I don't know. Reflecting on how you spent your entire summer doing nothing...

SirLegendary
offline
SirLegendary
16,583 posts
Duke

16. That hit the bullseye.

MalevolentDeath
offline
MalevolentDeath
323 posts
Prince

17. what are you guys on about???

trigon123
offline
trigon123
1,279 posts
Herald

19. Hello! What are we talking about?

Eldunari17
offline
Eldunari17
1,229 posts
Scribe

20. A great many things that would leave you with a lot more questions.

Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,892 posts
King

1. Please do not post non-count numbers because I may invalidate the previous count, but I will ban you if you have a pattern of doing so because you are being disruptive to the count. I will not tolerate this sort of behavior in this thread. There are other means of contact without breaking the flow of the count. I have already banned two users and removed their quests for doing so. If you are not willing to be part of the community and work together toward a common goal, instead of thinking of your own reward, this is not the place for you. This is a community quest for a reason.

MalevolentDeath
offline
MalevolentDeath
323 posts
Prince

1. Can you elaborate Gantic? Who did something outside the rules? and what was it so we know not to do it. Did he/she delete his post? casue I see everything is fine in these counts

Patrick2011
offline
Patrick2011
12,321 posts
Treasurer

(2) Two pages ago, Andelhofs made a non-counting post accusing Gantic of considering invalidating the count that was completed a few pages ago. That count had a few short posts, but I'm not sure if it's enough to invalidate the count as spamming.

MalevolentDeath
offline
MalevolentDeath
323 posts
Prince

3. Well the count should be fine (even thoguh I still havent gotten the achievement) and he stoped the count at a very low number so its not that bad imo. Also I understand his frustration cause this is the 4th time we have made it to 100 and the previous 3 have been invalidated... (also dont comment now cause of back to back)

UnleashedUponMankind
offline
UnleashedUponMankind
7,043 posts
Grand Duke

1. Count Von Count... that's a real "Counter"!

Showing 57046-57060 of 78431