ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Garlic Appreciation Club

78431 47063904
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,892 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,431 Replies
R2D21999
offline
R2D21999
18,319 posts
Treasurer

8. Who's side is Guest on? What do we do to her?

red303
offline
red303
7,571 posts
Shepherd

9. I'd say she is a spy for the mods. She seems much too optimistic to genuinely be on our side.

Guest_Pegasus1234
offline
Guest_Pegasus1234
1,276 posts
Farmer

10. I just want to be optimistic, I am on everyone's side

TheMostManlyMan
offline
TheMostManlyMan
5,783 posts
Chamberlain

11. Yeah, but she seems pretty optimistic in every thread she posts in.

red303
offline
red303
7,571 posts
Shepherd

12. Let's hold a trial.

TheMostManlyMan
offline
TheMostManlyMan
5,783 posts
Chamberlain

13. Alright then, place your bets; innocent or guilty?

Guest_Pegasus1234
offline
Guest_Pegasus1234
1,276 posts
Farmer

14. What's wrong with being optimistic????

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

15. I say guilty. Then I change it to innocent.

Guest_Pegasus1234
offline
Guest_Pegasus1234
1,276 posts
Farmer

16. innocent

red303
offline
red303
7,571 posts
Shepherd

17. I say both. Does she have a defense?

TheMostManlyMan
offline
TheMostManlyMan
5,783 posts
Chamberlain

18. There's nothing wrong with it in-and-of-itself, it's just that it's completely misplaced in this thread.

R2D21999
offline
R2D21999
18,319 posts
Treasurer

1. Yeah, restarting...

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

2. I say red is guilty for failure to edit his posts in time.

Guest_Pegasus1234
offline
Guest_Pegasus1234
1,276 posts
Farmer

3. My defense, I'm always optimistic and would like to be a positive part of the community

red303
offline
red303
7,571 posts
Shepherd

2. Let's pretend that didn't happen.

Showing 31456-31470 of 78431