ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Mods Allowed To Count

78425 46893722
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,892 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,425 Replies
Majestic_Fish
offline
Majestic_Fish
1,917 posts
Chancellor

57. HI! I'M NOT NEW AND HERE TO (hopefully) COUNT TO 100. Sorry for caps.

Aracwal
offline
Aracwal
2 posts
Farmer

1

kalisenpai
offline
kalisenpai
1,858 posts
Duchess

58. Ignoring that post because, in my opinion, is spam. Sorry if it's not

PLGuy
offline
PLGuy
4,755 posts
King

59. Ahh I missed the come back of Fisher

@kalisenpai I positively and wholeheartedly approve: that most surely, certainly and definitely was a spam indeed! Pardee; As sure as gun!

Hardstrike
offline
Hardstrike
543 posts
King

60. Dudes, let's try counting for real. Only 40 left

Majestic_Fish
offline
Majestic_Fish
1,917 posts
Chancellor

61. I miss NietzTheBlitz. Are exams this long? It was exams right, kali?

armorplayergc
offline
armorplayergc
16,463 posts
King

62. Only 38 to go... can we do it? discover in the next episode of "Life of a Counter"

LordLazyLeopard
offline
LordLazyLeopard
783 posts
Constable

63. Everyone should be increasingly aware that this is just a cruel joke from every mod/admin. They can restart the count at any point before 100. Therefore, they can wait another 3 or 4 days since we probably won't finish the count before then. Then, they'll reset it at around 90, just because mods/admins do that, that's the way things have always been on this thread.

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

64. They can't stop us if we go fast enough.

LordLazyLeopard
offline
LordLazyLeopard
783 posts
Constable

65. I mean, maybe, there's even flaws with that. But do you see us going "fast enough" here anyways?

Eldunari17
offline
Eldunari17
1,229 posts
Scribe

66. I shall contribute and make it one number more likely it will be.

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

67. According to all known laws of counting, there is no way we'll be able to succeed. However, against all odds we have managed to get this far. Let's continue on.

kalisenpai
offline
kalisenpai
1,858 posts
Duchess

68. @Majestic_Fish I talked to Nietz in the discord thing like a month ago. Maybe you could ask him directly

Majestic_Fish
offline
Majestic_Fish
1,917 posts
Chancellor

69. Yo. Yo in the phone can be 69. Just noticed now. A piece of useless trivia. Like, really useless.

PLGuy
offline
PLGuy
4,755 posts
King

70. Thank you, your trivia will change my life. What about finishing it real quick right now? I'm in chat.

Showing 67321-67335 of 78425