ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Garlic Appreciation Club

78431 47069778
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,892 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,431 Replies
Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

6. Too long! You're fired!

Omegap12
offline
Omegap12
1,980 posts
Shepherd

7. *Cries*

red303
offline
red303
7,571 posts
Shepherd

8. *laughs*

Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,892 posts
King

1. How many times has Omegap12 cried? 100?

red303
offline
red303
7,571 posts
Shepherd

1. I would probably die of old age if I tried to count.

Guest_Pegasus1234
offline
Guest_Pegasus1234
1,276 posts
Farmer

2. Now we have to restart again

TheMostManlyMan
offline
TheMostManlyMan
5,783 posts
Chamberlain

3. And probably many more times before we make it again.

red303
offline
red303
7,571 posts
Shepherd

4. Not like we were that far to begin with.

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

5. We can go the extra mile.

icycle2
offline
icycle2
68 posts
Bard

6. But since I wasn't in the last count anyway, I don't mind.
Also, I just got an idea. What if we got 100 people to agree to post at the same time, then edit their counts within 30 seconds so we counted to 100?

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

7. It'll be too chaotic and someone is bound to screw up.

red303
offline
red303
7,571 posts
Shepherd

8. Great idea. Now find 100 users who can all get on at the same time.

icycle2
offline
icycle2
68 posts
Bard

9. Points taken, but now we're a few counts closer
Also, if there are 3 of us here, couldn't we try counting now?

red303
offline
red303
7,571 posts
Shepherd

10. I did that once. Maybe we can get to 30 if we really try.

icycle2
offline
icycle2
68 posts
Bard

11. Did someone leave, mess up, or did one of they who shall not be named show up? Don't respond yet.

Showing 28051-28065 of 78431