ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Garlic Appreciation Club

78431 47064174
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,892 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,431 Replies
Jacen96
offline
Jacen96
3,087 posts
Bard

17. Hardest game 2014

~~~Darth Caedus

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

18. Editing on a tablet or a phone is really annoying.

Jacen96
offline
Jacen96
3,087 posts
Bard

19. QQ moar brah

~~~Darth Caedus

kalkanadam
offline
kalkanadam
797 posts
Peasant

[i]20. Finally! Someone that understand my pain!

9thDr
offline
9thDr
130 posts
Nomad

21. HI!

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

22. Goodbye to the 9th Doctor.

9thDr
offline
9thDr
130 posts
Nomad

23. he was one of the best tho!

Jacen96
offline
Jacen96
3,087 posts
Bard

24. Ninth is the worst of the new who.

~~~Darth Caedus

9thDr
offline
9thDr
130 posts
Nomad

25. mind telling me why?

bakkart
offline
bakkart
636 posts
Prince

26. The Ninth didn't get much of a chance to show if he was really good or really bad.

Rychip
offline
Rychip
147 posts
Peasant

27. I have nothing to contribute to any conversations in this thread at the moment.

9thDr
offline
9thDr
130 posts
Nomad

28. True. He just didn't get a chance to show. Although he is the Doctor! HOw could he be bad!

nichodemus
offline
nichodemus
14,988 posts
Grand Duke

29 Failure of communication.

Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,892 posts
King

I'm willing to be that people dislike the Ninth Doctor simply because he is more toned down and less eccentric than the other doctors.

Jacen96
offline
Jacen96
3,087 posts
Bard

1. Ninth is worst (not bad) because Eccleston quit. I honestly don't know IF I can pick a favorite.

now that's just cold

~~~Darth Caedus

Showing 8341-8355 of 78431