ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Mods Allowed To Count

78404 46347193
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,892 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,404 Replies
kalisenpai
offline
kalisenpai
1,858 posts
Duchess

2. We were breaking the rules???? Run for your lives!!!!

Majestic_Fish
offline
Majestic_Fish
1,917 posts
Chancellor

3. I shall not run and face head-on the problems of life. kali, stay in front of me and be a human shield!

PLGuy
offline
PLGuy
4,755 posts
King

4. Oh no I'm afraid it's already too late! We're doomed. Look for the omens - there will be signs heralding the new order. It shall rise from the ashes of our fail like a Fenix.

Majestic_Fish
offline
Majestic_Fish
1,917 posts
Chancellor

5. I can't find the omens... I always sucked at those types of games... Where do I have to click?

kalisenpai
offline
kalisenpai
1,858 posts
Duchess

1. This is not how we play this thing

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

1. Seriously?! No skipping numbers or taking shortcuts.

kalisenpai
offline
kalisenpai
1,858 posts
Duchess

2. I don't get why they do that...

Majestic_Fish
offline
Majestic_Fish
1,917 posts
Chancellor

3. Probably because they are too impatient and just want to get over it quickly.

helpo1
offline
helpo1
3,778 posts
King

(4) - or just want to troll us all. How effective.

kalisenpai
offline
kalisenpai
1,858 posts
Duchess

5. We should ignore them, y'know

Majestic_Fish
offline
Majestic_Fish
1,917 posts
Chancellor

6. We should but we reset because we are insecure...

PLGuy
offline
PLGuy
4,755 posts
King

7. I think we could've not reset because cat_lover intentionally broke the count.

zoroo30
offline
zoroo30
34 posts
Chancellor

8. i agree with you

Majestic_Fish
offline
Majestic_Fish
1,917 posts
Chancellor

9. I agree with you agreeing with PL.

armorplayergc
offline
armorplayergc
16,463 posts
King

(10) I agree with your agreement with zoroo30's agreeing with PL.

YAY!

Showing 65761-65775 of 78404