ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Mods Allowed To Count

78404 46314255
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,892 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,404 Replies
Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

1. Cut you off and it's all good.

shafaet
offline
shafaet
482 posts
Blacksmith

2. Guess we're not gonna make it to 100 counts anytime soon as long as UUM is around...

Last4Skull
offline
Last4Skull
2,265 posts
King

3. Haha yeah that's true

SirLegendary
offline
SirLegendary
16,583 posts
Duke

4. We've done it before, we can do it again!

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

5. Anyone skilled in building? We could use a couple thrusters.

IIxLadyLuckxII
offline
IIxLadyLuckxII
584 posts
Nomad

6. Or I could just shoot some fire out my hands you know... but what ever forget about me and build some thrusters if that's what you really want :I

SirLegendary
offline
SirLegendary
16,583 posts
Duke

7. I'm (not) skilled in building!!!

Swarmlord2
offline
Swarmlord2
2,081 posts
Marquis

8. Stick some pyrovores on whatever it is! They aren't really good for much else.

shafaet
offline
shafaet
482 posts
Blacksmith

9. Almost 1/10th of the way to 100, We can do this bois! *Whispers* Get uum distracted on something else long enough for us to make it to a 100

Eldunari17
offline
Eldunari17
1,229 posts
Scribe

10. 1/10 of the way.

shafaet
offline
shafaet
482 posts
Blacksmith

11. More than 1/10 of the way!

SirLegendary
offline
SirLegendary
16,583 posts
Duke

12. Your armatars are confusing. both of you.

Last4Skull
offline
Last4Skull
2,265 posts
King

13. Polar Bear Invasion !

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

14. Polar bears and time wizards don't go well together. Nobody knows why.

shafaet
offline
shafaet
482 posts
Blacksmith

15. Because Polar Bears can't bother worrying about time too much, unlike time wizards...

Showing 57931-57945 of 78404