ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Garlic Appreciation Club

78431 47065582
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,892 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,431 Replies
MalevolentDeath
offline
MalevolentDeath
323 posts
Prince

2. what are the rules of this chat? can I link a movie trailer that has the sickest graphics ever made? I just watched the movie and I must say I was impressed and want to share with you guys

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

3. As long as it doesn't break AG rules, it should be fine.

akshobhya
offline
akshobhya
5,063 posts
Justiciar

4. What was it all about?

SdVdis108
offline
SdVdis108
55 posts
Peasant

5. Ooh... I love movie trailers

Last4Skull
offline
Last4Skull
2,265 posts
King

6. I'm not sure about but as Chryosten said it. just take a look to the rules for precautions ^^

Frank_Frooton
offline
Frank_Frooton
4,002 posts
Bard

7 this is a number, can't you tell?

armorplayergc
offline
armorplayergc
16,463 posts
King

(8) a number is anything that stays unchanged after being multiplied by one, that's the correct meaning of "number"

8 x 1 = 8; as 8 = 8, "8" is a number.

helpo1
offline
helpo1
3,778 posts
King

1 (10) -

a number is anything that stays unchanged after being multiplied by one, that's the correct meaning of "number"

Are you therefore saying that (for example) any variable is a number on its own, not just symbolic representation of the value of said variable?
armorplayergc
offline
armorplayergc
16,463 posts
King

11. anything can be a number nowadays, it's simple, if I want to say "A" is a number, I can (a number which is =10)

Last4Skull
offline
Last4Skull
2,265 posts
King

12. It's what we call algebra isn't it ?

helpo1
offline
helpo1
3,778 posts
King

1 (13) - I disagree; I think that this particular A equals -7. How are you going to support your claim?

Last4Skull
offline
Last4Skull
2,265 posts
King

14. *Insert some epic random formula here *

armorplayergc
offline
armorplayergc
16,463 posts
King

15. I know A can't be negative because I found this: A = |A| which means A >= 0, therefore -7 is not an option for this A, but it can still be an option for A'

helpo1
offline
helpo1
3,778 posts
King

1 (16) - A = |A| is not specified anywhere in the conditions/premises. Therefore, A = |A| isn't necessarily true and your proof/argument is invalid.

MalevolentDeath
offline
MalevolentDeath
323 posts
Prince

17. So the movie I was talking about is this one. I watched it like yesterday and it blew my mind!!! Can you people believe this is ALL CGI, like no human actors or anything

https://youtu.be/htnkOpknGok

Showing 58951-58965 of 78431