ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Mods Allowed To Count

78405 46393021
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,892 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,405 Replies
Loop_Stratos
offline
Loop_Stratos
5,291 posts
Jester

15. what is this...

kalkanadam
offline
kalkanadam
797 posts
Peasant

16. *Fight

Loop_Stratos
offline
Loop_Stratos
5,291 posts
Jester

17. But why?

Snag618
offline
Snag618
6,704 posts
Blacksmith

18. I just want you all to know it's the end of the world as we know it.

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

19. Not if we move to another planet.

evilsweetblock
offline
evilsweetblock
2,613 posts
Jester

20
What are we talking aboot?
Saving edit before 30 seconds

RaonAbsoluteZERO
offline
RaonAbsoluteZERO
91 posts
Constable

1...... ****it

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

2. sweetevilblock, the editing before 30 seconds part wasn't really necessary.

kalkanadam
offline
kalkanadam
797 posts
Peasant

20. Evil has alot of intentionel resets before but with the new rules he cant do that so he makes it look like a late edit. He wasnt ninjad its an intentionel reset.

kalkanadam
offline
kalkanadam
797 posts
Peasant

I think mods can see edits. Ill ask Gantic if it was. If not he can reset it.

*Numberless post are ignored *

Loop_Stratos
offline
Loop_Stratos
5,291 posts
Jester

1. I am not sure if i should 21 or 3 so...

kalkanadam
offline
kalkanadam
797 posts
Peasant

2. Dude i said Gantic can reset if it wasn't intentional. This ***** has a history of intentional resets so i just ignored erything and said "GANTIC CAN RESEt IF IM WRONG" like wtf dude read the ******* thing

Arverniraider24
offline
Arverniraider24
1,088 posts
Peasant

3. Yikes.

Omegap12
offline
Omegap12
1,980 posts
Shepherd

4. *cries*

Arverniraider24
offline
Arverniraider24
1,088 posts
Peasant

5. we can do dis

Showing 7201-7215 of 78405