ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Garlic Appreciation Club

78434 47108193
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,892 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,434 Replies
nathandedell
offline
nathandedell
17 posts
Prince

15. Fun fact about 15, it is the atomic number of Phosphorus.

kalisenpai
offline
kalisenpai
1,858 posts
Duchess

16. I don't have anything interesting to say

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

17. The only interesting thing I have to say is that there's a spy over there.

kalisenpai
offline
kalisenpai
1,858 posts
Duchess

18. A spy? Oh my... Who is it?

PLGuy
offline
PLGuy
4,755 posts
King

19. He pointed out there, so that one must be a spy. Good job, I would never have guessed that.

perin106
offline
perin106
103 posts
Justiciar

20. I also have nothing interesting to say

kalisenpai
offline
kalisenpai
1,858 posts
Duchess

21. Have you noticed how every time it rains, the floor outside gets wet??? #incredible #madness #mindblown #WhyI'mUsingHashtagsIfIDon'tHaveTwitter

PHLHimself
offline
PHLHimself
300 posts
King

22. Wow that's actually pretty insane when you think about it.

sciller45
offline
sciller45
2,856 posts
Justiciar

23. But, why? My theory is that raindrops hit the ground hard, meaning the essence of wetness leaks out of the ground, making it wet.

Phew, that was a close one @PHLHimself, glad I refreshed the page!

armorplayergc
offline
armorplayergc
16,463 posts
King

24. No, that's because the ground gets sad because rain falling hurts him, so he cries and it gets wet

oyaji3211
offline
oyaji3211
258 posts
Herald

25. A retinue of intellectuals.

sciller45
offline
sciller45
2,856 posts
Justiciar

26. Interesting theory of yours, @armorplayergc! I first wanted to post that response, but I deemed it not stupid enough.

Yet another close call!

nathandedell
offline
nathandedell
17 posts
Prince

23. 10111

nathandedell
offline
nathandedell
17 posts
Prince

27. Sorry, my computer didn't load the new comments. Did I ruin it?

sciller45
offline
sciller45
2,856 posts
Justiciar

29. @nathandedell You COULD delete it but it could be cheaty. Me thinks we should start over.

Showing 67786-67800 of 78434