ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Mods Allowed To Count

78408 46523153
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,892 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,408 Replies
Yellowcat
offline
Yellowcat
2,869 posts
Treasurer

5. R.I.P. MattEmAngel
2011-2017
"He was a nice guy"

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

6. With Matt gone, there is now an opportunity to get post 70000.

kalisenpai
offline
kalisenpai
1,858 posts
Duchess

7. Nobody is going to ask why @helpo1 has a screenshot of Matt's account? 'Cause I'm curious...

PLGuy
offline
PLGuy
4,755 posts
King

8. 70K posts on CT100... There is it, déjà vu. @kalisenpai isn't that obvious? Helpo was a psychofan of MattEmAngel.

Yellowcat
offline
Yellowcat
2,869 posts
Treasurer

9. Naw, I'm sure Helpo had a good reason for doing it... Maybe...
And 70,000 posts!

helpo1
offline
helpo1
3,778 posts
King

1 (10) - I don't have a screenshot of it. I totally just remember it.

Also, 70kth reply. Yellowcat's was 70kth post.

kalisenpai
offline
kalisenpai
1,858 posts
Duchess

11. Oh, well, that makes more sense XD

HahiHa
offline
HahiHa
8,259 posts
Regent

1. Hmm... if you consider that the OP is not counted as a post, wouldn't that mean that the first post is also a reply and thus #post = #replies?

Moegreche
offline
Moegreche
3,827 posts
Duke

2. Seems reasonable to me. Kind of crazy to think about that many replies in a thread.

Yellowcat
offline
Yellowcat
2,869 posts
Treasurer

1. The mods actually counted above one! This is madness! The first reply is post #1, so posts=replies, therefore I had the 70kth post and reply.

PHLHimself
offline
PHLHimself
300 posts
King

2. Mods should be able to count to 100 so they can know when we've won

kalisenpai
offline
kalisenpai
1,858 posts
Duchess

3. Then this game wouldn't be fun, as it'd be too easy

PLGuy
offline
PLGuy
4,755 posts
King

4. That's right, this game would not have any sense and there wouldn't be any quest for counting to 100 if they were on our side.

armorplayergc
offline
armorplayergc
16,463 posts
King

(5) YAY! I've been a part of the 70,000th reply's page!

helpo1
offline
helpo1
3,778 posts
King

(6) -

Hmm... if you consider that the OP is not counted as a post, wouldn't that mean that the first post is also a reply and thus #post = #replies?

You're right indeed. I thought that the posts counter below the title still considered OPs as posts and therefore the number of replies was -1, but that must have changed.
Showing 68056-68070 of 78408