ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Mods Allowed To Count

78407 46501161
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,892 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,407 Replies
Yellowcat
offline
Yellowcat
2,869 posts
Treasurer

37. A contest? Wonderful! I shall provide myself to be the grand judge! Also, I upgraded to a constable yesterday without noticing.

kalisenpai
offline
kalisenpai
1,858 posts
Duchess

38. Congrats! And thanks for being the first participant! Here, have a cookie. *Hands cookie to @Yellowcat*

PHLHimself
offline
PHLHimself
300 posts
King

39. Is there something Yellowcat can't do?

kalisenpai
offline
kalisenpai
1,858 posts
Duchess

1. Restart due to edit

perin106
offline
perin106
103 posts
Justiciar

2. GAHHH! WHYYYYY. Ah well. Maybe this time we will get it

sciller45
offline
sciller45
2,855 posts
Justiciar

3 HAHAHA! Your optimism makes me laugh!
I may know an archer who would be happy to serve thee.

PLGuy
offline
PLGuy
4,755 posts
King

4. There is a probability that we will never win the count again! Buahahahaha! But it is like 0.0001%, you know.

We have to wait with the rebellion. @Majestic_Fish is in charge, I am just his left hand.

jackman629
offline
jackman629
14 posts
Jester

5. So if we manage to get to 100 have we all completed the quest or just the person who posts the 100th number?

PLGuy
offline
PLGuy
4,755 posts
King

6. @jackman629 Every person who participated in a succesfull count will get the quest, unless he/she has not already gotten it.

Yellowcat
offline
Yellowcat
2,869 posts
Treasurer

7. @PLGuy

unless he/she has not already gotten it.

I think you meant to say 'he/she has already gotten it.'
PLGuy
offline
PLGuy
4,755 posts
King

8. @Yellowcat the "no edits" rule is killing me, but what can I do ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Also I'd correct another mistake and write successful.

armorplayergc
offline
armorplayergc
16,463 posts
King

(9) but... mistakes are bad
I'm not perfectionist, because even if I were perfectionist, I wouldn't be able to be perfectly perfectionist

(lol)

Man, perfectionism is good only to a certain level...
Sometimes, for like a brief moment, all I wish in life is that I could be less perfectionist...
When you feel like you can't do anything right :/

Wew, sorry if this got too deep... let's count!

PLGuy
offline
PLGuy
4,755 posts
King

10. I don't care about many things until I start doing something that will be shown to people - then my perfecionism starts. And it's hard to stop from correcting little things that often have no meaning whatsoever, but usually I'm able to say STOP, so I guess it's just a mild OCD xD

MrDayCee
offline
MrDayCee
14,746 posts
King

10 is a nice number... so is zee roww...

And for the record, Matt self-deleted his account.

armorplayergc
offline
armorplayergc
16,463 posts
King

1. Hey, it's been some time I didn't see MrDayCee here

Matt self-deleted his account.

I know, he talked about it... dude, I miss him!
Like, you've had a small... uh... "argument" recently, but even you'll miss him, won't you? :/
I mean, people argue sometimes, I guess it's normal?

Showing 68101-68115 of 78407