There have been a lot of fantastic debates in this section of the forums, so I thought we could make things a bit more "interesting." Here's how it works: I will create profiles on which 2 people will debate one-on-one on a topic of their choosing. You will receive points based on 3 categories: argument strength, evidence, and refutation. Argument strength is just that - how strong are your arguments. Logical fallacies and cogency of the argument play a strong role here (so, is the argument "correct" and does it make sense). Your spelling and grammar are important to, so either get a browser with spell-check or put your comments in Word or something that can check your spelling. Evidence is articles or journals to which you can provide links to help support your argument. How reliable the evidence is also matters, so Wikipedia articles will not count towards evidence. Refutation means being able to counter what your opponent is saying. If you can point out flaws in their argument or present counter-examples to their arguments then you can get points in this category. The debate will go on until a predetermined score has been reached. The winner will have his or her best argument point merited - thus receiving 25 AP! ---- So, if you want to join, just put your name, the topic you would like to debate about, and how many points you would like to go to (I would suggest maybe 10 or 15 for right now, I'm not exactly sure how all the scoring will work out yet). Also include your stance on the topic. Once you have this info posted, you have just given out a challenge and anyone can challenge you. If you would like to challenge someone, then post your name, their name, and the topic. Feel free to create multiple challenges, so long as you can keep track of them all! Once two debaters have been matched, I'll post a link to the profile on which you guys will be debating.
I think that's everything, but here's an example of a challenge:
Name: Moegreche Topic: Does God exist? My stance: God does not exist!
If someone were to challenge me, then they would have to argue an opposing view to mine (in this case, that God does exist). So, let the debates begin, and if anything is unclear or if I've missed anything then let me know either on this thread or on my profile. Thanks, and happy debating!!
Okay, it sounds like you're going after Strop on the issue of the intrinsic worth of humans versus other animals. If that sounds agreeable to both of you, then Armed, tell how many points you would like to go to and I'll set up the account.
Name: DivineDarkness Topic: If a tree falls in the forest will it make a sound?" Stance: To make a sound there has to be air, and scince there is air in the rain forest obviously it will make a sound, if it was a air tight proof forest it wouldnt make a sound.
DaMasta, I don't think I can debate sufficiently well on either of those topics, sorry.
Armed: okay, it's a deal. I will debate from the stance that animals are not 'better' than humans. As soon as the profile's created, I'll build my case
I tell you - anyone can challenge me on any secular issue and tell me which side of the point to debate. I prefer the conservative viewpoint on political issues, but I can build a case for either side. In short, if it doesn't involve religion, challenge me on it.
Okay, Strop and Armed_Blade Debating on the Intrinsic Worth of Humans Strop, you will present your argument first You guys will go to 10 points (I think that's right) Here is your debating profile: http://armorgames.com/user/Debate_Morality1
