well I lie it the way it is right now... And this could cause a lot of problems, what if some how there are 30 members ahead of you with 45-46 AP, this IMO is not a seriuos change, there needs to be better improvements befor this should be taken in. Again this is all my ophinion.
Well it is pretty easy to pass someone if you are in that ranking. I am sure you could probably pass the person in front in just a litlle time. Not too huge of a deal, but when the site is done with major construction, they might put a ranking chart for the top 1,000 or something like that.
I just want to know if AP really means that much to everyone. I mean, the only thing it seems to accomplish is new armators. Don't get me wrong, I enjoy getting more AP, but, I'm not upset that I haven't even broken 1k yet. I still talk to people that are WAY above me in the rankings, and I still feal like a solid member.
But back to subject, I think the ranking structure is fine like it is. Because, I agree with Blaze, it will cause uncalled for aguing that will go nowhere but cause people to leave the site.
Yeah a top 100 is perfect. When have you ever seen a top 500 or soemething else. That's just may too much space and it won't look as good as it does now. Just imagine 500 names on a list! That just looks way too complex and confusing.
its easy to get past the 500-100 mark only like 5 minutes to pass 5 people So i think the current system is good, or you could put how much behind or ahead you are of a person...or make a like a 5 people personal highscore to see how many points you need
