ForumsWEPRis abortion ok?

869 81921
toemas
offline
toemas
340 posts
2,325

Is abortion ok? I donât think so. The babies that these people are killing is wrong, some people say that itâs not a person that itâs a bag of cells or a fetus and not really human being I have to disagree

Please debate

  • 869 Replies
MageGrayWolf
offline
MageGrayWolf
9,544 posts
2,210

Contraception and killing a fetus are two entirely different things.


How is it different for you? Is it not both preventing potential person-hood from forming?
Kennethhartanto
offline
Kennethhartanto
248 posts
7,635

Using selfish logic to suit your nit picking on a subject that people with a conscious and common sense know is wrong, is wrong


1. it's your selfish logic not mine, and i already said that in the word "using your logic"
2.people with a conscious and common sense are very subjectival, depending on someone's views, some would even say that Hitler is consciously basing his actions on common sense. I could even say that the north korea president Kim-il Sung is acting on common sense. so you're argument makes no sense to me, in the part of your "wrongness".

And by nit picking I mean singling out insignificant details and making them the focal point to make me look bad as if I represent all pro-life people.


1. your insignificant detail is your (maybe?) hopeless cover-up scheme that is as clear as night and day. It is important, which is proven when only you resent my choice to make it a "focal point"
2. what good i would get from making you look bad in front of the world huh? it's not like i was paid to make you look bad, and i got nothing by opposing you. in fact, i would suffer a drawback, which is making an enemy of you and getting banned for flamming.

Contraception and killing a fetus are two entirely different things. Yes, technically you do arrive at this conclusion when using logic, but you are blind to the facts that first must be assumed to be true before you can proceed with the logical method and hope to come to the correct answer. In a nutshell, your logic will continue to be irreparably flawed until you wake up to the facts.


So what's your problem with me using your logic in a slightly different way? if your logic WAS true, then your logicality would/should had no problem with others when they are to use it. Contraception and killing a fetus can be a different matter, but in the case of your logicality, it is on the same matter. so yes, the first is assumed to be true and so it (hopefully) justify the whole answer. Read, YOUR logic not mine, because i was using yours in a different way as opposed to how you use it.

Dang, I am better than you.
FishPreferred
online
FishPreferred
2,818 posts
18,265

Using selfish logic to suit your nit picking on a subject that people with a conscious and common sense know is wrong, is wrong. And by nit picking I mean singling out insignificant details and making them the focal point to make me look bad as if I represent all pro-life people.


No, actually, it isnt, as people with working rational centres know. To be selfish is to care about one's self. To care is to be swayed by emotion and impulse. Logic is not any of these things, but you very likely are.

The details you try to pass off as insignificant are, nevertheless, more than enough to reduce your argument to an empty husk if left unchecked, so I would not advise you to ignore them completely.

Contraception and killing a fetus are two entirely different things. Yes, technically you do arrive at this conclusion when using logic, but you are blind to the facts that first must be assumed to be true before you can proceed with the logical method and hope to come to the correct answer. In a nutshell, your logic will continue to be irreparably flawed until you wake up to the facts.


Of course, because gametes are not TRUE Scotsm- I mean - potential humans, are they? You claim that he is blind to "the facts", but at the same time you are withholding them. You speak of "the facts" as though you are about to produce them, but you have yet to do so.
pangtongshu
offline
pangtongshu
9,995 posts
3,285

After all, you like the movie A Serbian Film. Proof//armorgames.com/community/thread/ ⦠t-12239039. I know this is a bit off topic, but I'm not surprised that you are pro-abortion since you like a movie in which newborn babies are raped and tortured.


1) I don't like that movie, I love it. One of my top 5 favorite all time movies.

2) I'm not 'pro-abortion', I'm pro-choice

3) I don't like the movie because of the "Newborn Porn" scene. I like it because of its amazing plot, full of complex social criticisms and powerful scenes.
SportShark
offline
SportShark
2,869 posts
4,395

No, actually, it isnt, as people with working rational centres know. To be selfish is to care about one's self. To care is to be swayed by emotion and impulse. Logic is not any of these things, but you very likely are.

Perhaps logic isn't always correct then.

The details you try to pass off as insignificant are, nevertheless, more than enough to reduce your argument to an empty husk if left unchecked, so I would not advise you to ignore them completely.

Here goes my weekend.

Of course, because gametes are not TRUE Scotsm- I mean - potential humans, are they? You claim that he is blind to "the facts", but at the same time you are withholding them. You speak of "the facts" as though you are about to produce them, but you have yet to do so.

I guess that this argument is morphing into a values vs. ice cold logic battle.
Sometimes I think that you've sold your soul to logic (Yes, I know that you are going to say that you don't have a soul, but you understand).
Kasic
offline
Kasic
5,602 posts
3,605

themastaplaya, do you think abortion is justified in cases of rape?

Moegreche
online
Moegreche
3,297 posts
16,400

I really don't like the way that the word 'logic' is being thrown around here. Logic helps provide much-needed constraints on reason. If "logic isn't always correct" or should be outweighed by emotion, then we're in a world of hurt.
Feel free to check out my Introduction to Logic thread to see what logic is and what it's about.

But on the point about contraception vs. abortion, I've never liked the argument that says that anyone who uses a potentiality argument must reject contraception as well. This is for two reasons:

1) There are way better (and less slippery-slope-style) objections to the potentiality argument.
2) There does seem to be a clear, principled, and non-question begging distinction to be made. After all, a given sperm or egg doesn't have the potential for life. This line of thought shows a misunderstanding of the potentiality argument. It's *not* this:

PA1) Any action that interferes with a process that could create a person is immoral.

Instead, it's something like this:

PA2) Any action that destroys an entity that could be a person is immoral.

To get to the contraception worry, we would need PA1. But it seems like the potentiality argument is based on PA2.

There's another way of drawing the distinction based on intentional vs effective means. But this is a bit more complicated and I don't think we really need it to get the point home, though I'm happy to rehearse the argument if needed.

SportShark
offline
SportShark
2,869 posts
4,395

That sounds great, Moe! I like your reasoning 100 times better than pang's.

themastaplaya, do you think abortion is justified in cases of rape?

Unjustified yet tragic, rape abortions account for less than an estimated 1% of all abortions. The rest are because someone (lets not point fingers) was irresponsible.
FishPreferred
online
FishPreferred
2,818 posts
18,265

Unjustified yet tragic, rape abortions account for less than an estimated 1% of all abortions. The rest are because someone (lets not point fingers) was irresponsible.


What has that ratio (which I consider a very poor estimate) to do with this? Morality is not defined by whatever happens to be the majority of cases.
pangtongshu
offline
pangtongshu
9,995 posts
3,285

Um..tf? Why was I singled out, pray tell

SportShark
offline
SportShark
2,869 posts
4,395

What has that ratio (which I consider a very poor estimate) to do with this? Morality is not defined by whatever happens to be the majority of cases.

Then let's just say that in the rare case of a rape pregnancy that the fetus shouldn't have to suffer because of the rapist. I say that we should instate ancient Rome's penalty for rape to make rapists think twice.

Um..tf? Why was I singled out, pray tell

I wasn't referring to you If you're referring to my last post.
pangtongshu
offline
pangtongshu
9,995 posts
3,285

mm..can't edit on mobile.

So here is why I'm confused. My reasoning was singled out against Moe's..yet moe and I are discussing different Different topics. Moe is discussing contraceptives while I was discussing bodily rights.
So..how Were we paired like so?
1) did I miss something? And if so please thoroughly explain for me so I may understand
2) did you perchance miss something?
Or 3) This is a part of this recent obsessive posting on my behalf that has already had moderator interactions on.

Methinks it is the third..hopefully I'm wrong.

pangtongshu
offline
pangtongshu
9,995 posts
3,285

"I like your reasoning 100 times better than Pang's"

Explicitly referring to me. But I'm done discussing this in this thread..swayying far off topic

SportShark
offline
SportShark
2,869 posts
4,395

The world doesn't revolve around you and I've already given you plenty of my time which seems to have been a waste; you aren't getting anywhere but rather continually asking me: why?, why is that?, why was I singled out?, why don't you give more facts to support yourself? why?, why?, why?
All you're doing is waiting for me to say something that you can shoot down as illogical and that you can your fallacy template on top of. Logic is not absolute, it is subjective and easily applied improperly, much like a star-head screw diver trying to screw in a flat head screw.

"Explicitly referring to me. But I'm done discussing this in this thread..swayying far off topic"
Sorry, guess I forgot about that. It is of no importance though.

Kasic
offline
Kasic
5,602 posts
3,605

Unjustified yet tragic, rape abortions account for less than an estimated 1% of all abortions. The rest are because someone (lets not point fingers) was irresponsible.

Do you believe women who have been raped and become pregnant because of that should have the option of whether or not they want to have an abortion?

Showing 841-855 of 869