ForumsWEPR[nec]Christianity vs Atheism

3094 567311
kiddslayer12
offline
kiddslayer12
70 posts
Nomad

I am a christian, i and i strongly belive in my lord jesus christ, and i also belive that if you belive in him and except him as your savior, u will go to heaven. and i also believe that he created the world, not the big bang, or that we came from stupid apes.

  • 3,094 Replies
Moegreche
offline
Moegreche
3,826 posts
Duke

Some good points, Johnathan. It's nice to see people who can have faith and reason coexist.

I would like to see some Christian responses to this following argument, which is based in logic. For the purposes of this argument (and given the title of this thread) I will only focus on the Christian god to try to show the major tenet of their belief system to be self referentially incoherent. I have given a formal argument to try to help eliminate confusion. PR indicates a premise, def means the statement is true by definition, and I have used abbreviations for the rules of simple first order logic when they have been applied. I'm quite sure the argument is valid, but I'll check it again after I've posted it.

1 Christianity is self-identified as a monotheistic religion. (PR)
2 There are at least 2 distinct forms which this deity takes: god the father, and god the sun. (PR)
3 A and B are identical if and only if they share all the same properties. (PR)
4 It makes no sense to talk about two things that are identical. (PR)
5 If these deities are not identical, then they are distinct. (from 3 + def)
6 If these deities are distinct, then Christianity is polytheistic. (def)
7 It is not the case that Christianity is polytheistic (from 1)
8 It is not the case that these deities are distinct. (MT 6,7)
9 These deities are identical. (MT 5,8)
10 A father has the property of fatherhood. (def)
11 A son has the property of being born to his father. (def)
12 A father and son do not share all the same properties. (from 10, 11)
13 A father and son are not identical. (ID 3,12)
14 These deities (god the father and god the son) are not identical. (from 2,13)
15 These deities are identical and these deities are not identical. (CONJ 9,14)
/ The tenets of Christianity lead to a logical contradiction. (by 15)

It seems the move here is to say that Christianity is polytheistic to avoid the contradiction, but this is anathema to Christians. If you don't like my premises to show that god and Jesus were not identical, just consider Jesus' manner of speaking. He did not claim to be god, but merely the son of god. When dying on the cross, he actually spoke to god (himself?). We can also consider the holy spirit, which someone impregnated Jesus' mom before he could even exist - this is yet another deity for the Christian to handle.

BigP08
offline
BigP08
1,455 posts
Shepherd

But it's not even the gospels who wrote the bible; they would have all been long dead by the time the bible was written.. which means that it is, at best, vague stories passed down generations until someone decided to ink it to paper; not even beginning to get into the fact that it's been translated & re-translated into so many different variants.

Even if the stories were passed down, the Gospels are still as close as we can get. Are you denying that?
Yes, I remember this. Point is though, I'm not blind. I know of the story of Jesus, and the bible, and god, but I choose to ignore them. So.. while I'm not evil, I just don't worship god - however in the eyes of the bible, that makes me evil. I want to know what *you* think about people like me going to hell. Since you believe, and.. know, or think you know what happens after we die, then you have to know where I and people like me are headed. I want to know how you feel about that.

When as anyone ever said that non-Christians go to Hell no matter what? If you are a good person, you aren't going to Hell. I'm not the one who judges you, so don't ask me how feel about you going to Hell, because you haven't been judged yet!
Did any of those new testament scripture quotes I made sink in? The old testament is still a part of christian faith, and is meant to be followed. Just because you don't think it all makes sense or maybe disagree with some of it - according to your own beliefs, it's not your place to make those decisions; unless you're not a believer, in which case you can think whatever you want.

The Old Testament exists in its time and place, and was law in its time and place. Do you think people are still killed for sinning despite Jesus saying that the hour is changing? It's not important what it says precisely, but whether or not it applies to the new world in which the gates of heaven are opened.
Well, according to many parts of the faith, conquest, religious domination & slaughter are A-O.K. From the bible there are many stories of conquest (the best ones are where they only kill the wives, husbands & sons, and take the virgin daughters for themselves), and from more accurate historical data, we can look to the crusades, inquisition, and witch hunts.

I've always said that religion doesn't judge the person. These were moral failures within the Christian faith, and they aren't something you can judge me about. If you find ME involved in a witch hunt or crusade, then I'll happily admit that you caught me red-handed. Keep your eyes peeled.
At this stage though, we're not debating your opinion. The bible says it's wrong - I guess I'm having difficulty understanding your half-way stance on the subject & feeling bad for those people. Again, it's this case of the bible is the word of god, or it isn't. I don't have to care about any of the contents of the bible, but I find it very strange that many people who believe don't even read the bible or don't follow it's tenets as if it really was the word of god.

Well, I haven't read the whole Bible because I'm not a priest or bishop and I don't have any intention of becoming one. What's written in the Bible is not engraved in stone, and is not first-hand information. So some of us know our own God well enough to know how he would feel about people being tormented for being gay. Resisting sexual pleasure at all is a difficult test for a gay, and is not a fatal one either. Please, tell me where you're getting the idea that all Christians must do everything it says in the Bible no matter where or when it was written. Killing in the Old Testament doesn't apply anymore, eating certain foods doesn't really apply anymore. Even google Christian and try to find in its definition: someone who believes in Jesus Christ and must follow the exact words of the Bible words for words or they believe they will burn in Hell
I sure do - but that's another opinion I feel they should keep to themselves. Fine - christians feel abortion is wrong & that a woman shouldn't have the right to control what's going on with her own body. So... christians shouldn't have abortions. Keep your fingers out of everyone else's pies.

You can't be serious... You really don't know why the Church is against abortion, or why anyone could possibly be against abortion? You aren't aware that many consider the fetus to be alive? Even if you don't agree with that... get a clue (no offense)!
It's true though. It can be made almost entirely safe.. and yeah, some forget the almost, some will get careless or unlucky, or make mistakes. But those are their own mistakes to make. With proper education, they can make those educated decisions for themselves, and live with any of the potential consequences. But not preparing them for the possible outcomes I feel is irresponsible. We teach people how to drive properly, how to cook meat properly, to look both ways before crossing the road... should we tell people that driving is wrong and not show them how to do it properly because it *could* result in a serious accident if someone makes a mistake? No.

That's why I said it was true. And as I said before, they believe the fetus is alive, and not their own life, so that's why they won't let the others make the decision for themselves. Your analogy with car accidents was a good one, but unfortunately, over one million abortions occur in the US every year. Can't say the same about car accidents. Plus, they have at least had some worldly experience. The fetus is robbed of the light without having seen it yet. Don't mean to turn this into an abortion thread, though.

You seem to have already judged everyone in the Christian faith based on moral failures in the past. No matter what I say, you aren't understanding what I'm trying to tell you about Hell, forgiveness, sex... Maybe I'm wording it wrong, but you probably just haven't the least ounce of respect for Christians and don't find anything they say valid. Sorry to be so rude, but every post you've made has got me thinking, and I read them with an open mind. understanding what you were saying while not agreeing. You try to do the same, because you don't understand what I'm saying.
BigP08
offline
BigP08
1,455 posts
Shepherd

There are at least 2 distinct forms which this deity takes: god the father, and god the sun.

3, actually, God the Holy Spirit. Jesus mentions being willed with the spirit from time to time.
More to the point, there's no clear answer to your question (Bravo on the argument, by the way). The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit form the Holy, which is to say three forms of God but one God. Jesus was mortal, born human and divine, but once his humanity died he was only divine, and thus had the same chracteristics as God in heaven. When you pray, Christians say "In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit" so we're not making any distinction between them. But it's also a mystery even to Christians how three forms of God form one God. And some mysteries may be left unsolved until death.
DDX
offline
DDX
3,562 posts
Nomad

The Christian religion focuses on the trinity, as the magic number within the bible seems to be "3"

Christianity is a monotheistic religion even though there are seemingly multiple deities. God and his son and the holy ghost are 1 idea, which is why it is a self proclaimed monotheistic religion (because to the untrained eye it seems there are 3 gods...)

Moegreche
offline
Moegreche
3,826 posts
Duke

3, actually, God the Holy Spirit.

I realize the canonical doctrine of the Holy Trinity, although I've run across some Christians who deny the Holy Trinity because they don't think the holy spirit is really a deity, but rather more of an extension of god.
But this isn't simply a mystery, it's a logical contradiction. A mystery is something that we can't understand because of information or... whatever. A contradiction is something that cannot be understood. Any other system that results in a contradiction would be immediately rejected.
Notice that it's only Christianity that falls prey to this argument - no other religion (that I know of) does. This seems to be a clear indication that, regardless who's right in the search for "truth", it's certainly not the Christians.
Moegreche
offline
Moegreche
3,826 posts
Duke

Christianity is a monotheistic religion even though there are seemingly multiple deities. God and his son and the holy ghost are 1 idea, which is why it is a self proclaimed monotheistic religion (because to the untrained eye it seems there are 3 gods...)

How can they even be 1 idea? I mean, I guess I have can the idea of 3 baseballs and it's one idea, but that certainly doesn't imply there is only 1 baseball. My point is that this sort of doctrine leads to nonsensical talk about things that do not share the same properties and yet are identical. I don't see how this is defensible.
DDX
offline
DDX
3,562 posts
Nomad

It isn't, but then again I gave up my faith when I realized this 3 years ago.

I currently acknowledge that there is a creator or some kind of deity out there in the world.

paintballer222
offline
paintballer222
565 posts
Nomad

Actualy the number is seven 7 horses and riders, 7 lampstands, exc.


The difference between God and Jesus is Jesus can turn into a human being and die and fell pain and suffering.

Simularities; God and Jesus both have power and are way above the knowledge and existance of and otehr being.

Also only catholics say in the name of the father the son and the holy spirit.

Moegreche
offline
Moegreche
3,826 posts
Duke

The difference between God and Jesus is Jesus can turn into a human being and die and fell pain and suffering.

The god and Jesus are not identical. So Christianity is polytheistic. This inconsistency is my point all along.

Also only catholics say in the name of the father the son and the holy spirit.

I don't really know what this has to do with the argument at hand. But this is why my argument focuses on god and Jesus, which anyone who is a Christian must accept both of these deities.
BigP08
offline
BigP08
1,455 posts
Shepherd

Also only catholics say in the name of the father the son and the holy spirit.

Sorry, my mistake.
The god and Jesus are not identical. So Christianity is polytheistic. This inconsistency is my point all along.
This might explain it better. Consider the term God like a family. The father is not identical to the son, but they are still in the same family. Like I was saying before, the Holy Trinity is a mystery to everyone, doesn't make it any less true.
paintballer222
offline
paintballer222
565 posts
Nomad

God and Jesus are the same, but in order for people to survive we needed a sacrifice from a higher being. John 3:26, For god so loved the world he gave his only son that however shall beleive in him shall not die but have eternal life. Jesus was born as a baby (still as God though) and died for our sins rose from the grave and a month later rose again to the clouds.

Moegreche
offline
Moegreche
3,826 posts
Duke

the Holy Trinity is a mystery to everyone, doesn't make it any less true.

Like I said, this is not a mystery, it's a logical contradiction. I don't think there are many arguments that can deductively show something to be false, but I really feel this argument does. Any other doctrine that resulted in such a contradiction would be discarded by any rational being. As rational beings, we avoid contradictions like this. I think this does make the doctrine of the holy trinity not only less true, but demonstrably false.
Anyway, I'm off for a nice little Sunday run. Perhaps this line of argumentation has simply reached an impasse.
paintballer222
offline
paintballer222
565 posts
Nomad

The trinity is like one they all think and act the same way their all perfect. Also you use huge words so I'm having to look them all up in a dictionary so can you try to use easier words?

BigP08
offline
BigP08
1,455 posts
Shepherd

Like I said, this is not a mystery, it's a logical contradiction. I don't think there are many arguments that can deductively show something to be false, but I really feel this argument does. Any other doctrine that resulted in such a contradiction would be discarded by any rational being. As rational beings, we avoid contradictions like this. I think this does make the doctrine of the holy trinity not only less true, but demonstrably false.
Anyway, I'm off for a nice little Sunday run. Perhaps this line of argumentation has simply reached an impasse.

Have a nice run!
Anyway, I meant that we deduce by our own logic that it is impossible, but we may not yet understand HOW it is possible. I've done some theorizing on this somewhere in "The Premieval Atom" thread, how there could be a whole separate logic that revolves around a creator.
paintballer222
offline
paintballer222
565 posts
Nomad

I'm totally confused your saying taht god is some form? He has no form he is kinda like invisible not really there but he is everywhere.

Showing 1156-1170 of 3094