@ BigP08
Even if the stories were passed down, the Gospels are still as close as we can get. Are you denying that?
No - you're right, that is as close as you get. And I'm saying that's just not good enough as real evidence.
Well, I haven't read the whole Bible because I'm not a priest or bishop and I don't have any intention of becoming one.
Dude. *I've* read the bible - and that after I abandoned it - if you're a christian & you think to pretend to follow the faith but don't even know what it is yourself, how can you even pretend to have any grounds to argue on it?
So some of us know our own God well enough to know how he would feel about people being tormented for being gay. Resisting sexual pleasure at all is a difficult test for a gay, and is not a fatal one either.
So if you *know* how god would feel about one thing, but that one thing is contradictory to the bible, how do you know your feeling that sexual pleasure is bad isn't wrong too? It's my point on it's the word of god, or it isn't. You can't have it both ways by quoting parts of the bible to support your argument, and then ignoring parts of the bible that contradict your argument.
You can't be serious... You really don't know why the Church is against abortion, or why anyone could possibly be against abortion? You aren't aware that many consider the fetus to be alive? Even if you don't agree with that... get a clue (no offense)!
Offense taken - you're treating me as if I was an idiot and you don't address the issue itself as to why they don't keep their opinion to themselves. Of course I know the church's position on it - I disagree, clearly. Currently there are laws in place as to when the abortion of a foetus is legal, and when it's not. The judicial system is good enough for me, and I support a woman's choice on the matter. I don't support abortion - I'm not "YAY! Abortion!" but I could understand if say... a woman was raped, got pregnant as a result of it, and didn't want to give birth to the child. It's her body, it's her choice, and I don't pretend to know what that must feel like - so I support their ability to choose for themselves. If the church and christians care so much about the sanctity of life, then why have religious people killed the doctors who perform it?
Your analogy with car accidents was a good one, but unfortunately, over one million abortions occur in the US every year. Can't say the same about car accidents.
Yeah, me neither.
There were nearly 6,420,000 auto accidents in the United States in 2005. The financial cost of these crashes is more than 230 Billion dollars. 2.9 million people were injured and 42,636 people killed. In terms of deaths, or potential deaths, abortion has more, but it's also the law. Women have the right to choose and whether religious people disagree or not, that's the ballgame.
As to your final thought - no, I don't give credence to your arguments. They're not based on logical thought or scientific evidence. Great, you have faith in something - I think that's terrible. I understand what you're saying, and I abhorrently disagree. Above and beyond that, you haven't even read the bible, so how do you know what the christian stance on these issues is? You may think of yourself as christian, and believe in a set of values you've got on your own, but that's not christianity.. that's just being spiritual & believing in a higher power (something else I don't subscribe to because of the lack of evidence). Christianity *is* the writings and teachings of the bible, and if you don't know that, you have all of your work ahead of you.