ForumsNews and FeedbackSpam Bots

36 52070
Blackbeltr0
offline
Blackbeltr0
769 posts
Jester

I don't know if there was a system to catch these, but over the last couple days there has been an inappropriate amount of these things.
They just pop up I think in the programming forum repeatedly, but I may be wrong about that.

I have told ferret about the first one, and someone had already dealt with it. It happened yesterday and again today. Mod Moegreche is aware of this and today I also told Moderator Reton8.

I fear this will become worse.... Is there anyway to IP ban them or get the news out to people, because frankly it had 36 views and thank god no one posted, but maybe that is to small of a number, but is there a way we can get theses to stop or be reported faster? I think we need to stop this Spam bot raid. Can we is the question?

  • 36 Replies
Blackbeltr0
offline
Blackbeltr0
769 posts
Jester

Oh thought of an of an idea. Could we have those anti-spam things like what is 12-7 or that stuff when people sign up... Idk if that can happen, but I have seen them on other sites when you sign up.

Blackbeltr0
offline
Blackbeltr0
769 posts
Jester

I have not seen much like it though.... Yeah that was bad last year, but this is bugging me because I think it is 1 person like Moegrech said to either Ice or Me can't remember which, but he said. "just have to wait for them to make another account."

Ok come on, is there NO way we can Permanently stop this guy from spamming, like an IP ban or something?

All I really want is to raise awareness so we can stop these guys. It is a nuisance, that we should be able to stop (I think IDK if we can).

~~Black~~

MacII
offline
MacII
1,315 posts
Shepherd

Blackbelt,

I'm sure AG has its anti-spam measures in place (you probably don't wanna know what a place such as this would look like without them), and the mods noticeably clean up diligently after anything that's left. Aided perhaps by people who just simply but faithfully hit the report button on such messages. (And I've never seen any spam message last for long here; although their deleted presence may persist in cache a little longer, still, never for very long. Not even at what to my best knowledge should be off-hours.)

The problem will always be there, and tends to come in waves, and it can never be dealt with 100% effectively. But the way I see it, AG does a fine job at controlling things

(IP bans, btw, are a tricky thing -- not technically, to implement, but to target them right.)

Also kindly note that discussing their precise measures would be defeating the purpose, so I'm sure the staff won't, and I've seen them state that they won't and can't.

Moegreche
offline
Moegreche
3,826 posts
Duke

Just to be clear, the problem with spam bots is perennial and extends well beyond the borders of AG. We do have anti-spam measures in place but, as Mac point out, discussing these would allow the makers of the spam bots to circumvent these measures.

I'm genuinely proud of the work the moderator team has done in catching and deleting the spam and, of course, banning those spam accounts. The average time a spam bot account is active is typically under 30 minutes. But in that time, they can do quite a bit of posting.

We are actively considering a variety of measures to address the problem. But let's face it - spam bots will always be a problem. It seems that for every fix, there's a way to get around it. And keep in mind we want the site to be accessible and friendly to new users, so we have to keep that in mind.

As for IP bans, history tells us they don't work. It's very straightforward nowadays to change your IP. And, as Mac also pointed out, banning the right IP can be tricky. You might accidentally end up IP banning hundreds or thousands of potential (or current) AG users.

So in the meantime I have two bits of advice:
1) Don't post on threads that are from these spam bots. It actually makes it slightly harder for us to notice them. Instead, let a mod know about it.
2) For the love of God, don't click any links in these threads. Not only are you putting your computer at serious risk, but you're encouraging the whole process. At the end of the day, if these techniques fail to generate hits for these Websites, the problem will sort itself out.

boppins
offline
boppins
774 posts
Bard

We had stricter rules in the past to block spammers, but relaxed on them since the spammers disappeared. If it becomes an issue again, we will up the posting difficulty again until, once again, they go away

I believe the last thing we changed was turning off the "no posting until your account is 3 days old" check.

Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,891 posts
King

I believe the last thing we changed was turning off the "no posting until your account is 3 days old" check.


It was actually robots.txt. About the time web crawlers were allowed again, spammers started trickling back in slowly.
SSTG
offline
SSTG
13,055 posts
Treasurer

I think AG should go back to the 3 days or 2 days period before people can post. Also, if they don't favorite any games or play something during this period, their account should be deleted.

Devoidless
offline
Devoidless
3,675 posts
Jester

Yeah, great idea. Alienate and punish users wishing to just visit the forums. We don't require an account to simply play games here, and the only perk of making an account is access to online saves and the ability to comment. If we just deleted accounts for not playing a game within three days of making it, how many people would we lose?

And before you say "Who comes here for the forums and not the games?", I did for one.

SSTG
offline
SSTG
13,055 posts
Treasurer

Yeah, great idea. Alienate and punish users wishing to just visit the forums. We don't require an account to simply play games here, and the only perk of making an account is access to online saves and the ability to comment. If we just deleted accounts for not playing a game within three days of making it, how many people would we lose?

That's a suggestion. Do you have a better idea?
Devoidless
offline
Devoidless
3,675 posts
Jester

Just because it's a suggestion doesn't make it above criticisms.

I'd rather not discuss our current/potential measures against spammers out in the open.

Ferret
offline
Ferret
9,323 posts
Bard

We're cooking up an idea, we're thinking it may be earning Quests to post.

pft
offline
pft
574 posts
Grand Duke

I believe the last thing we changed was turning off the "no posting until your account is 3 days old" check.


This is something i think should be a good idea.

We're cooking up an idea, we're thinking it may be earning Quests to post.


Maybe, but i have seen some mmo players on this site that has no quests but post in the game forums.
pft
offline
pft
574 posts
Grand Duke

You have to earn the "One Hundred Freaking Million" Quest from Epic Combo Redux if you want to post on the forums.


No, i can't get that one due to my computers performance. I am sure alot of others that are active here don't have that.
xXxDAPRO89xXx
offline
xXxDAPRO89xXx
6,737 posts
Baron

You have to earn the "One Hundred Freaking Million" Quest from Epic Combo Redux if you want to post on the forums.


At that point the whole forums would be basically empty x)

I believe the last thing we changed was turning off the "no posting until your account is 3 days old" check.


That thing worked
FishPreferred
offline
FishPreferred
3,171 posts
Duke

A Thought:
From what I've seen, these spam threads all have multiple links. If any thread with, lets say 3 or more external links in the opening post were automatically relocated to a hidden "quarantine forum" of some kind, it would prevent naive users from being roped in and clear the regular forums of excess clutter. Would this be feasible?

Showing 1-15 of 36