Forums → Forum Games → Count to 100: Games Chat
| 78623 | 55308827 |
The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!
HOW TO PLAY
1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.
CORE RULES
No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.
ADDiTiONAL RULES
No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.
COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".
END GAME
Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!
SCOREBOARD
bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD
MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.
2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.
USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2
LAST TWO WINS
50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]
51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]
- 78,623 Replies
1-_-
Well i do. What made me mad was phil's idiocy.you know there planning to lock the thread because of this. I mean come on look at this phil. Just please go **** yourself (btw i put actual stars there its not censored. You can put anything you like there ) ( oh and its prob gonna get a late edit because it took me too long to write this)
I don't know whats wrong with me. I get really pissed when people do idiotic things.. Just please phil please quadruple check your posts
4. Kalk I know you're mad this happened, but there was no reason to really tell 09 to lick himself, people make mistakes. Also you're wrong, Gantic never said anything about locking the thread, and even if he did, 09 did accidents on both mistakes, which Gantic wouldn't lock because of accidents. You can't really purposely do a ninja after all.
6. It doesn't matter! You can't purposely be ninja'd even if it is twice. Even if he could have checked the count his browser maybe slow, I know because I have a slow browser myself, and it's really hard to edit on time with it, I'm not on it but trust me, Juno is not fast.
7Lick himself... Seriously? I said umm... Uhh.. Poke himself, yeah that's it. What was the discussion thread for? These accidents happen too often sure i would umdersand the first one mistakes could be lessons, but litterly his other post restart again. Those no one check there posts? (In a hurry, cant fix typos, deal with it!)
8. Im back and better than before! so what are we talking about?
Restart back to back posted. But its because you ninjad me there was no way i could have realized it
And i could prove you wrong in many ways but like i said im in a hurry so i cant, maybe later
2. Dude... now that was just on purpose. You know about the 1 2 1 2 rule. And don't blame it on me, you posted 4 minutes after me, that's not even ninja time.
And like I said before, slow browsers. You can't honestly expect someone with a slow browser to fix their mistake in under 30 seconds?
3. Like a said im in a hurry this is prob. My last post for now. Just wait ill prove you wrong later. And i didnt blame you it wasnt on porpose im in a hurry, so ship happens
You must be logged in to post a reply!