ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Games Chat

78653 56582939
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,891 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,653 Replies
R2D21999
offline
R2D21999
18,319 posts
Treasurer

63. Ah, I didn't notice that. Probably because I wasn't looking for grammar mistakes.

Snag618
offline
Snag618
6,704 posts
Blacksmith

64. I was pondering making a grammar mistake, to see if you'd notice, but I changed my mind.

R2D21999
offline
R2D21999
18,319 posts
Treasurer

65. You indeed made no mistake.

Omegap12
offline
Omegap12
1,980 posts
Shepherd

66. I survived!

Patrick2011
online
Patrick2011
12,319 posts
Templar

67. Everyone else should check You're banned for the specifics (I read your ban).

R2D21999
offline
R2D21999
18,319 posts
Treasurer

68. I read the ban too. Nothing lethal.

Omegap12
offline
Omegap12
1,980 posts
Shepherd

69. LOL. im gonna be a troll. I have the best number!!! Im in a really weird mood right now. I might be dehydrated.... brb.

Snag618
offline
Snag618
6,704 posts
Blacksmith

70. I hope your drink is tasty.

R2D21999
offline
R2D21999
18,319 posts
Treasurer

71. I hope not.

Omegap12
offline
Omegap12
1,980 posts
Shepherd

72. So you dont wish for my well-being?

Because that would make 3 people then. R2, and my parents. Im in a VERY dark but truthful mood now. God help me.
Edit: Dont feel bad for me. I hate the poeple that are all like, "Im SO sorry for you!" Ive gotten used to it.

Snag618
offline
Snag618
6,704 posts
Blacksmith

73. Omegap... it seems ANY edit after 30 seconds breaks the rule. For now though, let's just continue and see how it goes.

Omegap12
offline
Omegap12
1,980 posts
Shepherd

74. When was THAT specified? Last time i thought, it was only for numbers, not ANYTHING! And plus, i didnt want you guys to start that train. Dont need it.

R2D21999
offline
R2D21999
18,319 posts
Treasurer

1. Omegap! Why?! We were almost there!! And why didn't you start over Snag? Would have gained us a few numbers. Edits more than 30 seconds, ninja or not, break the editing rule.

Omegap12
offline
Omegap12
1,980 posts
Shepherd

2. I looked at the rules, AND they state, the only time editing counts is when its for numbers, nothing for words. Ive done that before, and it passed with no trouble, so dont yell at me for you not reading the rules right.

Or maybe i read them wrong. Whatever.

Snag618
offline
Snag618
6,704 posts
Blacksmith

3. We've recently found out it DOES apply to editing in general.

Showing 4051-4065 of 78653