Forums → Forum Games → Count to 100: Games Chat

78653	56611366

offline

Gantic

11,891 posts

King

Posted May 4, '14 4:59am UTC

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

The original "[url=http://armorgames.com/community/thread/5807578]This Thread is Currently About[/url]" is back! Yes, it's [b]Count to 100[/b]!

[b]HOW TO PLAY[/b]

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
     a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
     b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
     c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
     d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused. 
[b][i]NOTE:[/i][/b] For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

[b]CORE RULES[/b]

[b]No mistakes.[/b] A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
[b]No double-counting.[/b] No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
[b]No back-to-back counting.[/b] No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
     Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
     Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
     Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
[b]No editing.[/b] No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

[b]ADDiTiONAL RULES[/b]

[b]No "spamming".[/b] Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
     Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
[b]No "cheating".[/b] This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
     This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
[b]No "spoiling".[/b] Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the [i]correct[/i] number.
     Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
     Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
[b]No "spilping".[/b] If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
[b]No non-counts.[/b] No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without [b]bolding[/b] that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

[b][url=http://armorgames.com/community/thread/12341499/count-to-100-discussion-thread-page-8?page=5#reply-12356265]COMPLETE SET OF RULES[/url][/b]
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
     [b][url=http://armorgames.com/community/thread/12341499/count-to-100-discussion-thread]DiSCUSSiON THREAD[/url][/b]
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

[b]END GAME[/b]

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count ([b][url=http://armorgames.com/user/HahiHa/]HahiHa[/url][/b]) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

[b]SCOREBOARD[/b]

[b]bold[/b] = counted 100, [i]italics[/i] = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
[b][url=http://armorgames.com/community/thread/12341499/count-to-100-discussion-thread?page=9#reply-12402429]FULL SCOREBOARD[/url][/b]

[b]MODS - 2 WINS[/b]
Highest Count: [url=http://armorgames.com/community/thread/12301677/count-to-100?page=2534#reply-12451573]15![/url] :D
[b]1. 9![/b] - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, [url=http://armorgames.com/community/thread/12301677/count-to-100?page=2533#reply-12451566]Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm[/url], 3 users, 6 minutes.
[url=http://armorgames.com/user/Gantic]Gantic[/url], [url=http://armorgames.com/user/Ferret]Ferret[/url], [url=http://armorgames.com/user/weirdlike]weirdlike[/url]
   [i]Note:[/i] Earned by handicap.
 
[b]2. 14![/b] - 2135 pages / 937 days, [url=http://armorgames.com/community/thread/12301677/count-to-100-apply-directly-to-the-elbow?page=4668#reply-12641003]Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm[/url], 3 users, 6 mins. 
[url=http://armorgames.com/user/Moegreche]Moegreche[/url], [url=http://armorgames.com/user/nichodemus]nichodemus[/url], [url=http://armorgames.com/user/UnleashedUponMankind]UnleashedUponMankind[/url]
   [i]Note:[/i] Earned by handicap.

[b]USERS - 51 WINS[/b]
[b]1. 100![/b] - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, [url=http://armorgames.com/community/thread/12301677/count-to-100?page=355#reply-12338154]Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm[/url], 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
[url=http://armorgames.com/user/apldeap123]apldeap123[/url], [url=http://armorgames.com/user/Azywng]Azywng[/url], [url=http://armorgames.com/user/Crickster]Crickster[/url], [url=http://armorgames.com/user/Chryosten]Chryosten[/url] (as Darkfire45), [url=http://armorgames.com/user/Darktroop07]Darktroop07[/url], [url=http://armorgames.com/user/evilsweetblock]evilsweetblock[/url], [url=http://armorgames.com/user/JACKinbigletters]JACKinbigletters[/url], kalkanadam, [url=http://armorgames.com/user/Loop_Stratos]Loop_Stratos[/url], [url=http://armorgames.com/user/MPH_Complexity]MPH_Complexity[/url], [url=http://armorgames.com/user/Omegap12]Omegap12[/url], [url=http://armorgames.com/user/Patrick2011]Patrick2011[/url], [url=http://armorgames.com/user/R2D21999]R2D21999[/url], [b][url=http://armorgames.com/user/Snag618]Snag618[/url][/b], [url=http://armorgames.com/user/Tactical_Fish]Tactical_Fish[/url], [url=http://armorgames.com/user/Voyage2]Voyage2[/url]
 
LAST TWO WINS
 
[b]50. 100![/b] - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days. 
[i]sciller45[/i] (5)[17], [i]HalRazor[/i] [5], [i]saint_of_gaming[/i] [5], [i][b]JimSlaps[/b][/i] (1)[2], [i]TheMostManlyMan[/i] (1)[14], [i]Solas128[/i] [3], [i]nichodemus[/i] (2)[9], [i]Widestsinger[/i] [5], [i]SirLegendary[/i] (2)[22], [url=https://armorgames.com/user/skater_kid_who_pwns]skater_kid_who_pwns[/url], [i]disastermaster30[/i] (3)[5]
 
[b]51. 100![/b] - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days. 
[i]JimSlaps[/i] (1)[3], [i]sciller45[/i] (5)[18], [i]saint_of_gaming[/i] [6], [i]TheMostManlyMan[/i] (1)[15], [url=https://armorgames.com/user/Strop]Strop[/url], [i]skater_kid_who_pwns[/i] [2], [i]GhostOfMatrix[/i] [4], [i][b]WidestSinger[/b][/i] (1)[6], [i]HalRazor[/i] [6], [i]SirLegendary[/i] (2)[23], [i]Solas128[/i] [4]

78,653 Replies

online

Patrick2011

12,319 posts

Templar

Posted July 21, '14 11:57pm UTC

1. We seem to have missed that, so I'm restarting now.

offline

Seashark001

613 posts

Nomad

Posted July 22, '14 4:23am UTC Edited July 22, '14 4:23am UTC by Seashark001

2. Technically no, because there is no seconds bit there. It could have been posted at 350 and edited at 310.

Edit: @Patrick2011

offline

Reton8

3,173 posts

King

Posted July 22, '14 5:24am UTC Edited July 22, '14 5:27am UTC by Reton8

I was banished, but I have been summoned.
"Why do you call?"
0.

Technically no, because there is no seconds bit there. It could have been posted at 350 and edited at 310.

Actually this isn't true. I tested this myself, you always have a full 30 seconds to make and save your edit. If you post at 359, then edit and save your edit at 328 (that's 29 seconds), the edit tag will not appear.

Here are the full results of my edit testing.

- You must edit and save your post within 30 seconds.

- You must save your edit within 30 seconds. This means hitting the edit button within 30 seconds but not saving until after 30 seconds will cause the post to have the last edited tag.

-You do not need to refresh the page, within 30 seconds, after saving an edit. So, no worries if the edit/save button says saved for a while.

- You always have a full 30 seconds to make and save an edit. This means that if you make a post at 729 PM and then edit and save your post at 705 PM, the code will see this as within 30 seconds. The code does not consider this as a 1 minute difference.

[img]http://hydra-media.cursecdn.com/hearthstone.gamepedia.com/7/7b/Summoning_Portal%28566%29.png[/img]

I was banished, but I have been summoned.
"Why do you call?"
0.

[quote]Technically no, because there is no seconds bit there. It could have been posted at 3:50:50 and edited at 3:51:10.[/quote]

Actually this isn't true. I tested this myself, you always have a full 30 seconds to make and save your edit. If you post at 3:51:59, then edit and save your edit at 3:52:28 (that's 29 seconds), the edit tag will not appear.

Here are the full results of my edit testing.

[b]- You must edit and save your post within 30 seconds[/b].

[b]- You must save your edit within 30 seconds.[/b] This means hitting the edit button within 30 seconds but not saving until after 30 seconds will cause the post to have the [i]last edited[/i] tag.

[b]-You do not need to refresh the page, within 30 seconds, after saving an edit.[/b] So, no worries if the edit/save button says [i]sav[b]ed[/b][/i] for a while.

[b]- You always have a full 30 seconds to make and save an edit.[/b] This means that if you make a post at 7:55:29 PM and then edit and save your post at 7:56:05 PM, the code will see this as within 30 seconds. The code does not consider this as a 1 minute difference.

offline

Seashark001

613 posts

Nomad

Posted July 22, '14 6:25am UTC

1. Really @Reton8. Everything right except the number. Here we go again!

offline

Loop_Stratos

5,291 posts

Jester

Posted July 22, '14 7:26am UTC

2. Hi there.

offline

Riptizoid101

6,257 posts

Farmer

Posted July 22, '14 8:03am UTC

III. Hearthstone is 2014's most overrated game.

offline

Crickster

1,795 posts

Blacksmith

Posted July 22, '14 8:05am UTC

4. i'm back form two weeks of school or sleeping to see we still have not reach 100 yet.

offline

Loop_Stratos

5,291 posts

Jester

Posted July 22, '14 9:03am UTC

5. [1n50rt 91883r15h)

offline

Reton8

3,173 posts

King

Posted July 22, '14 9:44am UTC Edited July 22, '14 11:56am UTC by Reton8

5. [1n50rt 91883r15h)

Insert Gibberish? Incoherent Gibberish?

III. Hearthstone is 2014's most overrated game.

1. Really @Reton8. Everything right except the number. Here we go again!

If the number is wrong, you're supposed to start again, so even if everything else is "right" it doesn't matter. If the edit tag shows up, it always means it took a user more than 30 seconds to make the edit, so it means start again. As for mods, they don't have to post 0, when restarting the count, but sometimes will (unless Gantic makes a clarification here). I happened to post zero in my post. But at least the count was only 2 , and then 5. But I haven't posted too much in the thread. I'll probably go back into sleeper mode soon. :]

offline

09philj

2,825 posts

Jester

Posted July 22, '14 10:05am UTC

1. Let's all just calm down now.

offline

Loop_Stratos

5,291 posts

Jester

Posted July 22, '14 10:54am UTC

2. It's [Insert Gibberish] Reton the moderator.

offline

Chryosten

17,384 posts

Herald

Posted July 22, '14 11:05am UTC

3. I doubt Mods take too kindly to insults. Especially, if they make no sense.

offline

Snag618

6,704 posts

Blacksmith

Posted July 22, '14 11:31am UTC

4. I'm sure that is very correct. I hope he finds a reason to play Leeroy Jenkins!

offline

Loop_Stratos

5,291 posts

Jester

Posted July 22, '14 12:02pm UTC

5. what

offline

Reton8

3,173 posts

King

Posted July 22, '14 1:01pm UTC

Sorry, couldn't resist.

Showing 4351-4365 of 78653

Categories

Quests

Community

Forums → Forum Games → Count to 100: Games Chat