ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Games Chat

78654 56658991
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,891 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,654 Replies
Reton8
online
Reton8
3,173 posts
King

So if I post it goes to zero?
Well, zero then.

Patrick2011
offline
Patrick2011
12,319 posts
Templar

1. That is correct. Also, there was a back-to-back post from 19-22.

Snag618
offline
Snag618
6,704 posts
Blacksmith

2. That's what I was trying to prevent

JACKinbigletters
offline
JACKinbigletters
9,363 posts
Treasurer

3. Ah but each person did it twice, making four times, which according to the rules is a-okay.

JACKinbigletters
offline
JACKinbigletters
9,363 posts
Treasurer

5. As soon as I posted I saw my mistake and corrected it.

Snag618
offline
Snag618
6,704 posts
Blacksmith

6. Doesn't that break a rule?

Snag618
offline
Snag618
6,704 posts
Blacksmith

8. I was actually talking about editing it. Mainly because the You-know-whos can see unedited posts,

JACKinbigletters
offline
JACKinbigletters
9,363 posts
Treasurer

9. That may be true, but it doesn't say anything about it in the rules.

Snag618
offline
Snag618
6,704 posts
Blacksmith

10. I would have thought

RULES
No mistakes. No double-counting. No back-counting. No skip-counting.
would cover that.
JACKinbigletters
offline
JACKinbigletters
9,363 posts
Treasurer

11. I may have missed that first one... Blast my dyslexia...

Patrick2011
offline
Patrick2011
12,319 posts
Templar

13. All previous counting threads existed without an edit button. As for the back-to-back posting, no action has been specified as a response to such an event.

Snag618
offline
Snag618
6,704 posts
Blacksmith

14. So... should we continue?

JACKinbigletters
offline
JACKinbigletters
9,363 posts
Treasurer

15. We should... Perhaps

Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,891 posts
King

Should I edit in a no-editing your count back into the post rule? Most likely. Cast your vote! But it will most likely be added anyway. Did you notice that this has a Scoreboard? Neat right?

What's your opinion of a 4 back-to-back limit? Mostly it's to stop people from using this as a chat thread and having two players dominating the count.

Snag618
offline
Snag618
6,704 posts
Blacksmith

1. Yes, I saw the scoreboard, no, I don't think you should put in a no edit rule, and the 4 back-to-back limit is kinda annoying.

Showing 31-45 of 78654