ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Games Chat

78655 56797984
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,891 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,655 Replies
akshobhya
offline
akshobhya
5,063 posts
Justiciar

1. Do you like this new system or do you want the old one back?

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

2. I could do with the old layout but the reply box (or whatever the hell you call this box I'm typing in) is fine as it is.

Doombreed
offline
Doombreed
7,022 posts
Templar

3. Yup, admittedly the posting field is pretty good. But with the changes implemented so far, soon there will be no CT100. Late edits don't show up and one can always delete his post if he makes a mistake.

helpo1
offline
helpo1
3,778 posts
King

(4) - yup. CT1OO is not what it used to be anymore. Honestly, I expected it to be locked.

Swarmlord2
offline
Swarmlord2
2,081 posts
Marquis

5. This isn't good. I don't like it

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

6. Maybe implement a no deleting rule but let's be honest, who is even going to follow that rule?

helpo1
offline
helpo1
3,778 posts
King

(7) - I don't think there'd be that many deleted posts, but no-late edits would chop the difficulty by 80%.

Chryosten
offline
Chryosten
17,384 posts
Herald

8. I'm sure boppins would add it back in later.

jimmycarlos
offline
jimmycarlos
204 posts
King

9. The less help we get - the more epic the win, no?

akshobhya
offline
akshobhya
5,063 posts
Justiciar

10. No more time edit stamps?????? YAY! But, as far as deleting posts, I think the admins can come somehow come to know of it?

BUT, PLEASE DO NOT SHUT THIS GAME

DOWN.

Swarmlord2
offline
Swarmlord2
2,081 posts
Marquis

11. Not YAY. Very not YAY. Without that possibility of failure, the game can't work properly

akshobhya
offline
akshobhya
5,063 posts
Justiciar

12. I completely understand. but...you know, there should be some way of running this game flawlessly.....

akshobhya
offline
akshobhya
5,063 posts
Justiciar

12. I completely understand. but...you know, there should be some way of running this game flawlessly.....

akshobhya
offline
akshobhya
5,063 posts
Justiciar

12. I completely understand. but...you know, there should be some way of running this game flawlessly.....

akshobhya
offline
akshobhya
5,063 posts
Justiciar

12. I completely understand. but...you know, there should be some way of running this game flawlessly.....

Showing 53371-53385 of 78655