ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Games Chat

78654 56727794
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,891 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,654 Replies
helpo1
offline
helpo1
3,778 posts
King

39 - hmm, the Dutchman is online.

Aike
offline
Aike
47 posts
Treasurer

40
totally agree with this idea to be frequent :3

helpo1
offline
helpo1
3,778 posts
King

41 - ... but I don't think we can really make it working. Nevertheless, the second run has been done in 48 mins...

lolthejoke
offline
lolthejoke
164 posts
Duke

42 we can try faster but you need to check all the time.

RaonAbsoluteZERO
offline
RaonAbsoluteZERO
91 posts
Constable

43 just before 44

Aike
offline
Aike
47 posts
Treasurer

44

make it faster!

lolthejoke
offline
lolthejoke
164 posts
Duke

45 make it harder

RaonAbsoluteZERO
offline
RaonAbsoluteZERO
91 posts
Constable

1.... good job Aike -_-

lolthejoke
offline
lolthejoke
164 posts
Duke

46 bro he did it in 30 seconds.

Aike
offline
Aike
47 posts
Treasurer

47
yeah. youre make it doubling
same thing Raon :c

DarthTyrannausarus
offline
DarthTyrannausarus
538 posts
Nomad

48. We've gone a long way!

xXxDAPRO89xXx
offline
xXxDAPRO89xXx
6,737 posts
Baron

1. He did not do it in 30 seconds, that's why it says last edited below.

lolthejoke
offline
lolthejoke
164 posts
Duke

2. Well there was a comment in between so its technically not doubling and iterupting without a valid reason can be ignored since it was edited in 30 seconds... well in the 30 seconds a minute couldve passed you know

RaonAbsoluteZERO
offline
RaonAbsoluteZERO
91 posts
Constable

44

make it faster!

last edited Sep 20 2014 10:17 am by Aike



... did you play this before?
ranggagreat
offline
ranggagreat
73 posts
Chamberlain

4. damnit confused

Showing 14686-14700 of 78654