ForumsWEPRWorst War in History

617 113849
Mustang2653
offline
Mustang2653
29 posts
Nomad

I think it would have to be world war 2 because of all the lives that were lost

  • 617 Replies
notataco
offline
notataco
189 posts
Nomad

I'd have to say the Anglo-Zanzibar war considering the fact it only lasted about 38 minutes. Before you say im retarded or something the forum says the "worst" war not the most "brutal" war xD. A war between two nations that cant even last an hour is pretty bad considering the fact that a single battle can last for days.

XVERB
offline
XVERB
3,137 posts
Nomad

the real worst war has yet to happen WWIII with the same countrys as the others would kill everyone.

Kasic
offline
Kasic
5,552 posts
Jester

the forum says the "worst" war not the most "brutal" war


I interperet worst as the most damaging to the world/nation. There is no way you can replicate the damage done over 6 years in 38 minutes.
XVERB
offline
XVERB
3,137 posts
Nomad

[/quote]the forum says the "worst" war not the most "brutal" war

isan't the most brutal war the worst one?

notataco
offline
notataco
189 posts
Nomad

ye you make sense but we all interpret things differently. I wish people would realize that WWIII probably wont even happen and if it is i doubt itd be the worst. Considering the power of military technology now ideas no one in their right mind would even think about starting a world wide war unless they want to die.(which some leaders do unfortunetly)

XVERB
offline
XVERB
3,137 posts
Nomad

well the good news is that with the new tech everyone will die quick and painlessly.

notataco
offline
notataco
189 posts
Nomad

It does beat getting hung or stoned. Although radiation is the after effect problem.

XVERB
offline
XVERB
3,137 posts
Nomad

no one knows how much being hung hurts no one survived to tell. but its probly pretty painless

German3945
offline
German3945
996 posts
Nomad

but its probly pretty painless

suffocation is not painless. not all hangings result in the neck breaking, and later ones involved such less and less.
tomertheking
offline
tomertheking
1,751 posts
Jester

From what i've read, WW1 had around 5-10 million deaths, where as WW2 had between 40million to 60million. Never seen how many deaths vietnam had so whatever.


WW1-37 million
WW2- 50-70 million
vietnam- 3-4 million
lewij99
offline
lewij99
26 posts
Nomad

I'm thinking WW1 cuz so many people died without getting shot cuz of the poor conditions its terrible to be honest!

SirNoobalot
offline
SirNoobalot
22,207 posts
Nomad

The crusades, which technically isnt consider ed just one war but a series of wars over the 'holy land'. many a man were to go to take back the holy land and no one ever saw them again.

Kasic
offline
Kasic
5,552 posts
Jester

The crusades, which technically isnt consider ed just one war but a series of wars over the 'holy land'. many a man were to go to take back the holy land and no one ever saw them again.


The thing with the crusades though was that almost every person who fought in them thought they would have a secure position in heaven if they did, so it probably didn't seem that bad to them.
SirNoobalot
offline
SirNoobalot
22,207 posts
Nomad

then again some were pressured into doing it or just flat out half enslaved and thrown in

Chuckleluck
offline
Chuckleluck
74 posts
Nomad

Somebody said the Cold War. The Cold War wasn't a real war. It was a time of hostility between the Soviet Union and the US from 1945 at the end of WWII to the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991. Although several real wars were produced, such as the Vietnam War and the Korean War, the Cold War was pretty much just fear.

I think WWII. In case you guys don't know your history, in WWII 60 million lives were lost. That's 1% of the world's population. That might not seem like much, but it adds up!

Showing 436-450 of 617