ForumsWEPRWorst War in History

617 113829
Mustang2653
offline
Mustang2653
29 posts
Nomad

I think it would have to be world war 2 because of all the lives that were lost

  • 617 Replies
theone99
offline
theone99
3,041 posts
Shepherd

WWII, most deaths from ANY war in history, to me, that makes it the worst. And the events leading up to the War itself, made it more bad.

daxflame44
offline
daxflame44
151 posts
Nomad

the american civil war because the most american lives were lost than any other war compared to america's population during the war

theone99
offline
theone99
3,041 posts
Shepherd

the american civil war because the most american lives were lost than any other war compared to america's population during the war


True. and the pay wasn barely enough to buy some eggs and a bag of.. flour? i forgot which one it was.
tomertheking
offline
tomertheking
1,751 posts
Jester

the american civil war because the most american lives were lost than any other war compared to america's population during the war


Who cares what nationality the corpses were?

1860: 1,270,044,073 world population
1940: 2,299,541,939 world population
American Civil war: ~625,000 lives lost
WW2: 62 to 78 million lives lost

1,270,044,073/625,000 = 2032.07
2,299,541,939/62,000,000= 37.09
2,299,541,939/78,000,000= 29.5

The lesser the number, the bigger the presentage of killed compared to the world population was. WW2 was far more deadlier than the Amirican civil war
Drace
offline
Drace
3,880 posts
Nomad

2,299,541,939/62,000,000= 37.09
2,299,541,939/78,000,000= 29.5


Lmao, that's still roughly 0.02% of the population.
theone99
offline
theone99
3,041 posts
Shepherd

The U.S. population reaches 31.4 million, twice its 1840 level, with 4 million of the total foreign-born. The birth rate among whites is 41.4 per thousand, down from 55 in 1800, but the excess of births over deaths is still the main source of population growth.
-Source


1860: 1,270,044,073 world population

Why did you put down the WORLD population? It was call the "CIVIL WAR" for a reason you know..

As you can see the population in AMERICA was only 31.4 million or so. The war produced about 1,030,000 casualties (3% of the population), including about 620,000 soldier deathsâ"two-thirds by disease.[172] The war accounted for roughly as many American deaths as all American deaths in other U.S. wars combined.
-Source
SubZero131
offline
SubZero131
598 posts
Nomad

I say the worst is yet to happen.

WW2, holocaust was unnecessary, and Europe got raped buy it. it did help US economy thought but meh

Drace
offline
Drace
3,880 posts
Nomad

Yeah but why does it matter if it were AMERICAN deaths?

Hell...stil...

How bout the 25 million Russians who lost their lives in WW2...in a population of roughly 150 million.

Comes to about 17%

BlackVortex
offline
BlackVortex
1,360 posts
Nomad

World War 2.
Mainly because of the holocaust.

Drace
offline
Drace
3,880 posts
Nomad

You do realize that far many more soldiers and civilian lives were lost than the number of Jews involved in the Holocaust?

Drace
offline
Drace
3,880 posts
Nomad

You do realize that far many more soldiers and civilian lives were lost than the number of Jews involved in the Holocaust?

BlackVortex
offline
BlackVortex
1,360 posts
Nomad

Well I don't know much about history.. never been interested in it.
But weren't most of the civilian deaths caused by bombings and famine etc?

Which is completely different to being hunted down, taken to camps and slaughtered..

Not that they aren't both terrible events but Holocaust seems worse to me.

Drace
offline
Drace
3,880 posts
Nomad

Well I don't know much about history.. never been interested in it.
But weren't most of the civilian deaths caused by bombings and famine etc?

Which is completely different to being hunted down, taken to camps and slaughtered..

Not that they aren't both terrible events but Holocaust seems worse to me.


Starvation and being a war casualty is a horrible way to die. I mean, 12 million Russian soldiers died in combat as well as 10 million Germans. Imagine a battlefield where everyone is trying to hunt you with guns, tanks, bombs or bayonets.

The Germans as well as the Allies also heavily bombed a lot of cities, causing heavy casualties.
There was also the capturing of almost 3 million Soviet Prisoners of War by the Germans which were intentionally killed.

Also few notable sieges like Leningrad where 700,000 Russians were starved to death.

But the battles themselves caused huge deaths. Over 1.5 million people died for example in the Battle of Stalingrad itself.

What's horrifying about the Holocaust was the intentional genocide of a whole race, but I must say, the war clearly caused much more severe casualties.
theone99
offline
theone99
3,041 posts
Shepherd

or bayonets


Bayonets aren't designed to be a primary way of killing in War, it's a close-quarters secondary design.
TheAKGuy
offline
TheAKGuy
995 posts
Nomad

WW2, definitly.

Showing 541-555 of 617