lol k sry guys bout acronyms...Hj= hand job. BJ= Blow job. AJ shoulda been RJ... rim job... but i was stupid and thought anal rim job or sumthing... And ZJ i recently found out was giving one of those when u and the other person is high and possibly drunk... lol.
Porn is okay, when you are making a baby? And when you just want to jerk off? Really, there is no reason for this to be locked, the title warns enoigh, and besides, there is at least one mod discussing this too, meaning it have to be a "legal" thread.
Hmm, rim jobs~~ I think that is some of the only things that is illogical in porn, as it is not that sexy, unless you yourself experiance it (for those who like that); I does not look like porn, just something bizarre.
Like ive said before you dont choose porn over sex, instead of it. Watching porn whilst 'making a baby' is a very odd thing to do. I dont know many women who would be ok with that kind of thing, its kind of insulting.
Porn is ok when ur making a baby??!! Well wouldnt you rather be thinking about the person ur having sex with than the person on the tv screen?? Porn will never be illegal.
I actually agree with this statement. No matter how well it is handled the kids will always be immature about it. I had sex ed when i was 12. Most of us already knew about it, but formalising it made it seem comical. I say let kids find out what happens on their own. They didnt have sex ed hundreds of years ago so why do we need it now, interrupting the natural course of things.
Huh. People in my class where mature about it, at least while in class... Then we had a bunch of giggles afterwards, but the educational movies worked...
Most PUBLIC schools do not teach sex ed correctly.
I went to public school. Sex ed classes in seventh grade, they were great. But then again, I live in Denmark, we quite possibly do it differently.
they should lock this porn is not legal unless you are 18 or older the only time porn is ok is when your making a baby
... But the discussion of pornography is okay to have here, that is why the thread isn't getting locked yet... And wth makes porn okay only when making a baby.
Hmm, rim jobs~~ I think that is some of the only things that is illogical in porn, as it is not that sexy, unless you yourself experiance it (for those who like that); I does not look like porn, just something bizarre.
I think I'd get nauseous watching a vid of a rim job... Just like when there's sucking on something that went in that hole... It's just icky... Eck... But, still no reason to make it illegal, just lots of reason for me not to watch it.
Huh. People in my class where mature about it, at least while in class... Then we had a bunch of giggles afterwards, but the educational movies worked...
Are you joking, the movies were the funniest part, seeing a cartoon penis become erect and have a monotone voice describe the erection. Thats pretty funny if u ask me. Or at least it was when i was 12. The problem with sex ed is that kids nowadays know far more than the adults realise so ex ed seems stupid and patronising.
Are you joking, the movies were the funniest part, seeing a cartoon penis become erect and have a monotone voice describe the erection. Thats pretty funny if u ask me. Or at least it was when i was 12. The problem with sex ed is that kids nowadays know far more than the adults realise so ex ed seems stupid and patronising.
... XD We had better movies. A bit dry, but not boring and still informative... I dunno, I learned something.
... XD We had better movies. A bit dry, but not boring and still informative... I dunno, I learned something.
Well i probably learned something too, maybye without realising it. Sex ed in my opinion should be more about STDs and condoms etc as that is the biggest problem, in Britian anyway.
Theres far less sites devoted to child porn than regular porn. You would have to shut down half the internet to do this.
From a legal perspective this would be tricky too. You can't just shut down sites. Kentucky tried to do this with gambling sites and were taken to court saying it was a breach of human rights, as the internet sites themsleves are not 'owned' by one country as it is after all the world wide web. They lost the case.
