I think Rush says things that a lot of people thought but were too embarrassed to say
You got me there...I do thinks blacks dont need to be heard because they are only 12% of to population. And I do think that the most beautiful thing about a tree is what we do with it after we cut it down. Ive just been to embarrassed...Rush Limbaugh has shown me the light!
You got me there...I do thinks blacks dont need to be heard because they are only 12% of to population. And I do think that the most beautiful thing about a tree is what we do with it after we cut it down. Ive just been to embarrassed...Rush Limbaugh has shown me the light!
.............Now that is SARCASM
The difference between you two is that your sarcasm sucks.
No he is not. You just don't like him because he speaks his mind.
If some one said that we should bring slavery back or that black people shouldnt have rights. Would you say that this isnt an awful person and that they are just speaking their mind.
If some one said that we should bring slavery back or that black people shouldnt have rights. Would you say that this isnt an awful person and that they are just speaking their mind.
I don't really see how that's revelent. It's one thing to say I don't like liberals, it's something completely different to say lets bring back slavery.
"Why should Blacks be heard? They're 12% of the population. Who the hell cares." -Rush Limbaugh
It was republicans who abolished slavery.
Because of FDRs new deal and later change by JFK and LBJ the party ideologys changed. A republican then was more like a democrat now. Sure it was a republican that freed the slaves he held liberal ideas, he did go to war over states rights.
That's like saying that "whigs abolished slavery" because at the time, the republican ideology was the liberal party. Take a cruise on the failboat, why don't ya? ----------- What he says being sarcasm doesn't help; what he says is still wrong, and he considers himself a serious newsman, when he is obviously just an entertainer.
What he says being sarcasm doesn't help; what he says is still wrong, and he considers himself a serious newsman, when he is obviously just an entertainer.
Ok, so everybodies an entertainer? Ok, I won't pay atention to anybody anymore and live in a bubble.
Ok, so everybodies an entertainer? Ok, I won't pay atention to anybody anymore and live in a bubble.
He's about as serious as Colbert. News that isn't for entertainment. . .is unbiased, boring stuff like C-Span. Other stuff has some sort of entertainment value to it. And even those are more serious than Rush. If he's blasting sarcasm and stereotypes for half the time, then sorry, but he's not news., Ever notice that actual news repoting is serious, and doesn't involve sarcasm? Also, living in a bubble=AIDS, other immune problem. :P
Also, living in a bubble=AIDS, other immune problem. :P
Immune disorders have nothing to do with the current conversation. :P
He's about as serious as Colbert. News that isn't for entertainment. . .is unbiased, boring stuff like C-Span.
Rush is for both, entertainment and news. Of course it's biased towards liberals, it's on the radio, which is the only media type that conservatives own.
