Terrorism isn't supposed to kill people, like the name suggests it is supposed to strike "terror" into the masses. So if everyone is freaking out about it. Then the terrorists have succeeded.
terrorists pirates STDs cancer heart disease socialism i'm afraid to turn on the news anymore cuz i might learn about something else i have to worry about is there ever any good news on anymore? like maybe a fireman rescued a cat from a tree or something
Yeah, i don't think there is a single news channel left that reports good news.
In Canada there is a law that 60% of all news must be positive.
I cannot, and will not hold back my dislike of Diane Feinstein and Pelosi right now. . .they're asking for too quick of a withdrawal from Iraq. . .we need to pace ourselves. . .Obama is alright with me
you just wait dude, he is going to ruin this county
too late, the last three presidents beat him to the punch. We've been on a downfall since George H.W. Bush. . .besides, he won't ruin the country. . .he hasn't done anything particularly good or bad yet.
we all need to stop terrorism, but thats the long hard way to war. war is needed but it hurts to say that the world doent know how to live in peace..........
Such a broad topic, but I would like to pose a problem: can we come up with a good definition of terrorism? This isn't isolated in a particular group of people, nor are all particular people in a certain group necessarily terrorist. But what makes someone a terrorist? Is it simply the fact that they terrorize? That seems too broad, though. Thoughts?
