I my self am a proud veg and im a guy i dont see any thing wrong with that, however my peers constantly put me down for it. I question others about it and some say that animals are kiled to keep the population under control, then shouldnt we do that to humans? are there any other vegetarians on armor? if you are a caravor responding to this please try not to be insultive i get enough from my freinds and family
I just like eating meat but you shouldn't always eat meat. Anyway all creatures kill things to survive, animals eat other animals, some animals eat plants, some plants eat animals. This is just natural. So I think animal slaughter should be allowed.
Me?I am not a vegetarian but I really only like Chicken and Ham otherwise I don't really eat meat.I don't think it's wrong to like meat.I do of course love animals I would never try to harm an animal I just eat them.
Well, here's an interesting point. One doesn't try to "harm" animals, but one "eats" them- which points to a handy separation that most of us consumers have from the gritty reality of the meat industry.
But is this necessarily a bad thing? It's definitely something many people take for granted.
Hot dogs are every thing that your little heart can imagine in germany in the 1920's the serial killer "The Butcher of Hanover" killed little boys and sold their meat on the black market ( meat was illegal and hard to come buy ) as a pork substitute. Strop is correct, if you are going to eat meat would you slaughter the animals that you eat ?
I wouldn't slauter it but yes to survive I would kill it and eat it. I have already done that. I went hunting with my grandpa in Oregon it was fun. We used everything from this deer that I shot. You may not think this but hunters, at least the ones that, I know have a great respect for animals and nature.
It is very true I know a few but what about the ones who leave the animals carcasses there and come on the deer was having a good time with his calfs maybe he had young-ins to go back to and maybe even a mate
He might of, he might not of. I don't feel bad for shooting it mostly becuase it was a male and it was after mating season so if it had a mate then that relationship was over and if it had a faun then the male was no longer needed. If you want to go into left behind animal carcasses you might want to look at page 41. We go into a dissucion of how animals actually don't use as much of the carcass as we do.
No i am talking about the classic r*dn*ck killing and animal with a high powered rifle and just walking away, think about what you just said? relationship was over and if it had a faun then the male was no longer needed. So after you were born would it be ok if some thing came and killed your father, right after you were born?
Thats not how deers think. It is natural that the male in almost any species leaves the mother and child. We are really the only kind've species that have somewhat lasting relationships. It is wrong that people do just radomly shoot a animal and walk away but the majority of the time we take something from it and then scavangers will eat the meat so really all we are doing is takeing the spot of a lion or something.
Except that we do not take the place of anything. Instead we become another predator. And yes, redneck killing is bad. Leaving the carcass espesially. In my opinion you either use the whole animal, or you just don't hunt.
Are you calling me "Strange Guy". Don't get mad at me if you can't go against my ideas becuase the only reason I'm here is to actually make a argument.
It's cool. If I don't make an argument then what is the point of having a debate or a forum. I enjoy seeing peoples answers to questions and statments.
