AGS Steam Games

Forums → WEPR → how could you not bielve in god

98 11093
inferedmonkey
offline
inferedmonkey
942 posts
Peasant

how could you bielve all of this just happened that it was a accidented i mean the butiful secnery

the ability of life the aility of thuoghts the heart just happened to go in the body in the rtight place and the brain the intestns the colen the feet the nose .Ect

we dident just happen to form out of adams and molicules randomly placed here an there

i mean first of all they say that energy was there but they dont say how it got there

they say that the energy exploded but they dot say why and there was no are for a fire to be fueled by

they say there was matter and anti matter they were atracted to each other but they dont say why

they say they exploded but agian no air for the explosines

they say there was the exact same amount but yet matter suveved

there are a few problems with ther anti god thieres all explaned by a chilled now desscuses

  • 98 Replies
ligaboy
offline
ligaboy
1,051 posts
Peasant

i mean first of all they say that energy was there but they dont say how it got there


'They say' god exists but they don't say how he got there
PsychoticDreamer
offline
PsychoticDreamer
13 posts
Nomad

are you post happy?
you've made 2 threads in the last 3min

Green12324
offline
Green12324
4,097 posts
Peasant

So now that you've told us why science doesn't explain everything, please tell us how religion does.

Neither one can tell us anything, but at least science is logical. Composed of facts, not a book written by normal people thousands of years ago.

Green12324
offline
Green12324
4,097 posts
Peasant

everything, not anything**

Sorry.

inferedmonkey
offline
inferedmonkey
942 posts
Peasant

mabey i should think these thread through more thourely befor i make them sorry i guess i got cote up in the flaws of seince and simpley took my belives as true i am very sorry agian

Somers
offline
Somers
1,532 posts
Nomad

Wheres a grammar nazi when you need one?

Green12324
offline
Green12324
4,097 posts
Peasant

Wheres a grammar nazi when you need one?


Lol, there should be a hotline.
thisisnotanalt
offline
thisisnotanalt
9,821 posts
Farmer

Ummmm. . .If I could understand your grammar well, I still wouldn't have a hard time poking holes in your arguments.

. . .Ahem.

how could you bielve all of this just happened that it was a accidented i mean the butiful secnery


Your use of the word 'accident' implies that you think there *must* be a god in the equation, making this a non-objective argument. Now, it's only your opinion that plants and dirt are beautiful, correct? It's not fact the 'secnery' is 'butiful.'

That makes this point invalid, as it's only an opinion.

the ability of life the aility of thuoghts the heart just happened to go in the body in the rtight place and the brain the intestns the colen the feet the nose .Ect


Have you read the theory of evolution, or at least a part of it? This point, as I see it, springs from a lack of understanding in evolution. Also, theism also has nothing to do with life. Just strictly the existence of a god. So this point is irrelevant, and therefore invalid.

we dident just happen to form out of adams and molicules randomly placed here an there


Once again, your wording implies that you think there *must* be a god, indicating bias. And guess what? We *are* just formed out of atoms and molecules. Around 7 octillion atoms, to be precise. Once again, we evolved to be where we are, most likely. So we didn't just happen to form out of atoms and molecules - we grew from our mother's wombs, and over a period of time the number of atoms in our bodies grew.

i mean first of all they say that energy was there but they dont say how it got there


Time and space ae linked. All the matter in the Universe (not necessarily just energy) was in a singularity trillions of times smaller than the do on a lowercase 'i.' And therefore, all time was there too. No time = no beginning, no end. So no origin needed. This point is invalid because you simply do not have the facts or ample understanding of the theory to make an argument such as this against it.

they say that the energy exploded but they dot say why and there was no are for a fire to be fueled by


Just. . .just. . .JUST. . .AAAARRRRRRRGH!

It didn't explode, and I don't know how the hell fire came into this. It was super-compressed, and it just expanded once it reached critical mass.

they say they exploded but agian no air for the explosines


Redundant. It didn't explode, and fire is not needed to make an explosion. Just. . .you must have no modicum of understanding of the theory if you say that seriously.

they say there was the exact same amount but yet matter suveved


I would refute this if I could understand your grammar.

Also, what does 'suveved' mean?

there are a few problems with ther anti god thieres all explaned by a chilled now desscuses


Could you please tell me what problems there are? The Big Bang theory isn't anti-god, and whatever 'oints' you brought up refute the Big Bang about as much as the existence of mashed potatoes refutes the existence of a god.
Moabarmorgamer
offline
Moabarmorgamer
8,570 posts
Nomad

This thread is kind of flaming atheism you know.

And who is they? Seriously?

Oh and people would take you a lot more seriously if you took the time to spell words correctly and use grammar.

how could you bielve all of this just happened that it was a accidented i mean the butiful secnery

the ability of life the aility of thuoghts the heart just happened to go in the body in the rtight place and the brain the intestns the colen the feet the nose .Ect

we dident just happen to form out of adams and molicules randomly placed here an there

i mean first of all they say that energy was there but they dont say how it got there

they say that the energy exploded but they dot say why and there was no are for a fire to be fueled by

they say there was matter and anti matter they were atracted to each other but they dont say why

they say they exploded but agian no air for the explosines

they say there was the exact same amount but yet matter suveved

there are a few problems with ther anti god thieres all explaned by a chilled now desscuses


That's just sad. There are so many errors there. How old are you, seriously? This is how it should have been written. I will fix it for you.

How could you believe all of this just happened? That it was a accident, I mean, the beautiful scenery, the ability of life, the ability of thoughts, the heart just happened to go in the body in the right place and the brain, the intestines, the (no idea what you meant there), the feet, the nose, etc.

We didn't just happen to form out of atoms and molecules randomly placed here and there. I mean first of all they(who is they?) say that energy was there, but they don't say how it got there. They also say that the energy exploded but they don't say why, and there was no air for a fire to be fueled by. They say there was matter and anti-matter, and they were attracted to each other but they don't say why. They say they exploded but again no air for the explosions. (You really need to say who "they" are. I mean, we could be talking about atheists or we could be talking about an evil army of bunnies plotting to take over the world, and there's no way to tell because you don't say who "they" are!).They say there was the exact same amount but yet matter survived(duh! Matter can't be created or destroyed! Didn't you go to fifth grade?).There are a few problems with their anti-God(they're not anti-God, they don't believe in him. Anti-God is a totally different thing than Atheism) they're all explained by a child(yes, most definitely), now discuss this.

And now I shall find further fault with your theories.

A. WHO IS THEY?
B.
they say there was the exact same amount but yet matter suveved.
Yes. Because matter cannot be created nor destroyed in any way known to mankind.
C.
they say they exploded but agian no air for the explosines

Yes, there was indeed air. And it was not purely energy. Energy is an entirely different thing than matter. Matter is the, let's say, building blocks of all things. Energy is the thing that fuels matter. This is Basic Science 101.
D.
the ability of life the aility of thuoghts the heart just happened to go in the body in the rtight place and the brain the intestns the colen the feet the nose .Ect

This, according to scientists, did not simply happen. It was evolution. We probably did not start off with most of these things. But we evolved, for we needed food and water, and to protect ourselves from predators, and we needed to be able to process these things. The creatures with variations rather like the organs we now have survived, had babies, and so the next generation all had the special organ. This is Basic Heredity 101.
E. In conclusion, before you go flaming other religions, take a look at your own first, and don't make mistakes or no one will take you seriously.
Snakebite
offline
Snakebite
996 posts
Nomad

This thread is kind of flaming atheism you know.


Wait... Hold it right there! Don't the atheism threads flame Christianity? They sure do! I'm afraid we'll never get away from that though, because we'll never agree.
Moabarmorgamer
offline
Moabarmorgamer
8,570 posts
Nomad

Yes that is true. But I'm just saying. Yes, atheism threads flame Christianity as well.
Yes, to be fair atheism flames Christianity as well. They are just about exact opposites. But I'm kind of hating on this guy's thread lol. Not to be mean or anything, but it does get annoying. Everyone's entitled to their opinion and I'm not trying to convert anyone or anything, I'm just stating my position on the matter.

thisisnotanalt
offline
thisisnotanalt
9,821 posts
Farmer

Don't the atheism threads flame Christianity


Not really. . . .

And this thread isn't flaming, it's just. ..failing. Sorry if I sound insulting, but the arguments are built on misunderstanding and false facts. . . .
Snakebite
offline
Snakebite
996 posts
Nomad

And this thread isn't flaming, it's just. ..failing. Sorry if I sound insulting, but the arguments are built on misunderstanding and false facts. . . .


I actually agree. But I've seen much flaming in the atheism threads... That's why I'm not posting in them anymore.
thisisnotanalt
offline
thisisnotanalt
9,821 posts
Farmer

Yes that is true. But I'm just saying. Yes, atheism threads flame Christianity as well.


Flaming: christinity iz 4 bile tumpin idits fuk dem

Flaming: athism iz 4 adultrists and hrtless b@strds hoo will go to HELL

Christian thread: Religious blablabla. . .try to refute atheism, fails, puts up a decent argument

Atheist thread: Atheist blablabla. . .logic blablabla. . .tries to refute Christianity/existence of a god, fails, put up a decent argument. . . .

See? Flaming is insultng, where this is just heated debate.
thisisnotanalt
offline
thisisnotanalt
9,821 posts
Farmer

But I've seen much flaming in the atheism threads...


To be honest, I've seen more in Christian threads. :/
Showing 1-15 of 98