well if any of u r familiar with the law of conservation and mass, then u know that it states that matter cannot be created from nothing, or completely destroyed. so evolutionists say this, then turn around and say the big bang created the universe as we know it. WTF!!?!?!?!the universe went from non existent to existent in a fraction of a nanosecond! and where did the bigbang come from? nothing? nope, because if the law of conservation and mass is true, then the bigbang isnt. simple...
obviously the big bang did it they have proof dont they?
Proof is not a scientific term. Actually, there is a load of theories around the Big Bang and the universe and all that, and it is pretty darn hard to actually prove any of them. Because, you cannot actully watch the Big Bang occur (but if you are lucky, you can watch something close to that timeframe).
My friend (who's entire family are very devout Catholics) has decided that his belief is in God creating all the matter, packing it into the tiny spot, and setting off the Big Bang. Scientific eveidence takes over from there.
Give your friend a pat on the shoulder from me, will you? Pretty much the same oppinion I have. I see no reason why religious beliefs and science should not get along with a little open mindedness.
My friend (who's entire family are very devout Catholics) has decided that his belief is in God creating all the matter, packing it into the tiny spot, and setting off the Big Bang. Scientific eveidence takes over from there.
If you notice, though, God made birds before He made lizards. According to your "scientific evidence", the lizards came first, unless your friend believes that the entire creation part of the Bible is messed up.
If you didn't got. he said his friend believes that God only started the chain reaction that came with the Big Bang. All after that weren't altered by Him.
