. . . anyway, even if microevolution and macroevolution are not the same, they are reducible to one another, and extended microevolution will result in macroevolution.
. . anyway, even if microevolution and macroevolution are not the same, they are reducible to one another, and extended microevolution will result in macroevolution.
The first thing they did when they were proven wrong instead of changing there views to fit the evidence they tried to suppress the discovery and charge the person how made it with heresy. It was only until so many more were able to come to the same conclusion to the point they could no longer keep it suppressed that they changed there ways.
Hey, you can't blame me for that! That was the Catholics! Blame Cinna! :P
Wow, It blocked his name!!! Lets see if this gets through: 0ba/\\/\\a.
Here's another thing about your fossils.
Logically you would think that a Dinosaur with half a wing and half a beak wouldn't be able much very well. Logically it seems that Dino-birds would Die because they have wings that they can not use, beaks that get in their way etc. Why is it that we find TONS of fossils of dinosaurs, many fossils of birds, yet your evolutionary scientists get so happy when they find 1 or two dino-bird fossils that are still in dispute?