Correct me if I'm wrong, but the way I see it:
I read the entire thing (and now my head hurts) and dusted off my dictionary, but it seems as if you have to breaking a law:
EXAMPLE:
Lets say I'm going 98mph on the free way in Arizona, cause I'm late. Well, the cop pulls me over and ask for my ID:
Scenario 1:
I give the cop my ID, I get a ticket, and possibly a huge fin, and all is well (somewhat).
Scenario 2:
Cop ask for my ID, which I dont have. My license and Registration, which I also dont have. IF I HAVE NO WAY OF IDENTIFYING MYSELF, the cop has reasonable suspicion of me being illegal, and can detain me. Since I am an American Citizen, I can prove my legality eventually.
It just seems to me like its allowing everyday cops to do what the border patrol's been doing forever...
14th Admendment:
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.
Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.
Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
Since this law is addressed towards ILLEGAL immigrants, they are not citizens of the United States. Yes, the State of Arizona is required to treat them equally under the law, but since they are NOT citizens of the United States, I'm thinking this means they dont have rights UNDER THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. I'm guessing they would be under UN Sanctions, or the Mexican Constitution.
Thats my two cents.
