I can see the logic behind it, but the pathetic elitsm that follows most athiests i have met is a huge downside. Athiests use logic so much, it become flawed. Anything they say about religion is theoretical ignorance. Yet they think everything they say about religion is cold hard fact.
Overall athiests are logical, but a majority of them really have no idea what they're talking about half the time they speak about religion.
debating religion is retarded, i don't know what your trying to get at.
Then what are you doing debating the lack of a religion? Besides, many Christians consider atheism a religion, so I think, yes, you are being a hypocrite.
Oh, and what about the people who forcibly converted hundreds of thousands, if not millions of "agans"?
One of the reasons I'm an atheist is because the past of every religion I know of, I find morally disturbing.
But many atheists on this site debate religion. Thus, they are the people you describe and have named ignorant. However, they give many credible sources for their arguments. So this should prove you wrong.
And you stating that the bible is not 100% fact is not relevant. Many Christians believe the bible word for word, and this where atheists get their arguments from. Also, saying that is not 100% fact is only your opinion, many Christians would disapprove of that statement.
1. You mean they're not their and Atheists not Athiests 2. If you knew anything about Atheism, anything at all, then you wouldn't make such ignorant, biased and completely blanket statements about Atheists.
don't grammer nazi.
If i knew anything about atheism..?
Before anyone else comments, I'll say it AGAIN.
WHEN ATHIESTS TRY TO DISPROVE RELIGION, THEY ARE ACTING RE-TARD-ED, and anything i say about athiests, is based on every athiest I KNOW.
I'm not trying to say all atheists are fucking idiots, or horrible people, or anything like that. I'm not GROUPING THEM as a whole, I'm basing everything I say off of the atheists I KNOW.
there are of course, a few nice atheists that I know out there.
also, this thread is to list your views on athiesm. nobody seems to realise that.
By the same logic, when Theists try to disprove science they are also being retarded, stop being such a hypocrite.
Disprove science? completely irrelivant. When you try to disprove religion, there is no fact on anything you are saying. Religion is based on faith, you can't debate faith.
You can go ahead and disprove everything in the bible, but you cannot disprove religion as a whole.
i think atheism is pointless, it shows no punishment for bad moral behavior (except for law), so when you die, there is no punishment, making life like an "all-you-can-eat" for chaos and disorder.
Just because it has no eternal punishment for wrongdoing doesn't make it pointless, are you saying that if the Bible gave you no examples of punishment or hell, you would be breaking every law you found because you thought nothing would happen to you?
i think atheism is pointless, it shows no punishment for bad moral behavior (except for law), so when you die, there is no punishment, making life like an "all-you-can-eat" for chaos and disorder.
First, moral is relative, second, when you only believe in one life you tend to not want to waste it in prison.
i think atheism is pointless, it shows no punishment for bad moral behavior (except for law), so when you die, there is no punishment, making life like an "all-you-can-eat" for chaos and disorder.
So why do I return a dropped $20 bill to the owner? Why do I donate money to charities?
So when Christians try to prove their religion, they're acting retarded? So why even involve religion in this discussion, or any other discussion? Then why did you even create this thread?Right, to troll. I'm basing everything I say off of the atheists I KNOW. Which is a logical fallacy.
bold'd, i didn't involve religion other than atheism in this topic. and i personally don't think atheism is a religon. read the first page.
Yes, when we try to prove our religion, we are retarded. i didn't ever say they werent did i? don't try to disprove OR PROVE religion, cuz you will ultimately fail.
I'm not trying to prove religion, im saying when people try to disprove it, they are acting retarded.
Disprove science? completely irrelivant. When you try to disprove religion, there is no fact on anything you are saying. Religion is based on faith, you can't debate faith.
News flash, science is considered a religion, look it up in a dictionary.
bold'd, i didn't involve religion other than atheism in this topic. and i personally don't think atheism is a religon. read the first page.
You can't involve one without the other, or you have nothing to back any of your statements up.
Yes, when we try to prove our religion, we are retarded. i didn't ever say they werent did i? don't try to disprove OR PROVE religion, cuz you will ultimately fail.
Actually, science has done a fairly good job of destroying most of the bible. I.e. it's all BS, just look at a little bit of science.
All of it is hyper exaggerations and metaphors. Most of it didn't actually happen.
