I don't think it sucks. There are just a few problems that people bitch about(noobtubes and OP killstreaks). And realistically, those aren't that bad, they just might screw up some matches for you, but chill out. People just expect perfection from MW2. And it's been out for a while now, and people are STILL complaining about noobtubes and stuff in games, it's sooo annoying lol.
Guys, it's just a game, when you're getting your *** kicked, just turn off the X-Box, and do something else that takes your mind off the game.
Kaboni, I may be a very angry person and such, and I am one of those people who complain about Modern Warfare 2, but you are 400% correct. I might sound like a hypocrite when I say this, but when you're angry at Modern Warfare 2, just stop playing (but look at page 1 for my comparison...). There are many other fun games out there to play. Hell, you don't even need to play Xbox or PS3 when you don't like Mw2. There's this thing called outside where you can do an infinite amount of things. Take a walk, play some basketball, call up a friend, take a deep breath and relax.
mw2 does suck. like you said in the OP to many kill streaks.
and i think that if your going to put something that automatically makes you win the game (nuke) then make it near impossible to get. 25 kill streak is absolutly nothing with all the kill streaks that are in that game. they need to make it a 40 kill streak or somthing like that. ridiculous? yes. necessary? yes
Well, the mono campaign is kind of chaotic, and I never really liked these over-realistic games that try to recreate true battlefield environments, it's too chaotic. However, the multiplayer's great, and I like to play plenty of time with my friend in rust.
Well, the mono campaign is kind of chaotic, and I never really liked these over-realistic games that try to recreate true battlefield environments, it's too chaotic. However, the multiplayer's great, and I like to play plenty of time with my friend in rust.
1. Single Player wasn't chaotic 2. Battlefield is atleast 3x more chaotic (and awesome) if you get into "that situation", I literally couldn't feel my legs when I was in one (rofl!) 3. It is nowhere near realistic: Commando Pro - Jump off the ridge in Afghan = You Survive. Cold-Blooded - Not done with humans No useable Vehicles Really small maps Unbalanced Weapons (M9-3 > M4A1 / Knife > Sniper, wtf?)
And if I was in a war I wouldn't be screaming "HAAXAXXKKXOOORRRRRRR!!!!!!" into the mic, lol
That's just my point, and I suggest you try Battlefield
The killstreaks are overpowered. You can't dodge a killstreak. There are some matches where there's two harriers in the air and a chopper gunner. There is really no way to dodge that. How about you stop camping in a corner and using a FAMAS with Commando and use a REAL gun.
I think that the famas is a real gun.. Its not some make belief weapon some gamer designed in his head, and now magically incorporated into the game to make it a fake weapon.
I agree with Kaboni but nonetheless I think MW 2 kinda sucks. They could have made it better. I still need to try Battlefield Bad Company 2 to have a nice comparison between these 2 games
I think that the famas is a real gun.. Its not some make belief weapon some gamer designed in his head, and now magically incorporated into the game to make it a fake weapon.
It is a real gun, end of. Defining real, any weapon you invent, inside that game, it's real. This is in no way based on real life. Just same weapons, but entirely different storyline and realism (I can't imagine a medieval version, u get ur leg decapitated but it regenerates in non-hardcore ROFL).
Yes modern warfare sucks. 1. So many noobtubers 2. Too many killstreaks 3. It is not based on a real war 4. Special Ops sucks balls 5. Treyarch is awesome
if they made any fps shooter realistic, no one would buy it (except cs:s)
Only thing not realistic about BFBC2 is mobility, oh and u don't feel pain. Need to have the game chair from stargate (season 8) or the Matrix without cool glitches (lol)
