Iran doesnt have that great of nuke power. US wins there. i live in a state that nukes are buried realy for launch Everywhere. so yay us if it was a missle war. if it was war without it would have to do with teaming
No one's mentioned Eastern Europe as a possible starting point for World War III.
Anyway, Obviously in a Nuclear conflict no one wins (This has been stated 247 times in this thread.).
In a conventional war, if it involved the invasion of another country, the true war would be over in a matter of days or weeks. After that, it would mainly be a matter of occupation and clean-up. War moves quickly these days.
whoever launched the nukes first would win. End of story.
Errr no. You can't launch a nuke to every single country all at one time... If one country happens to attack, say USA, then allied countries will help the USA. (I'd assume xD) So, that statement is false.
Like others have said, I think everyone would die.
Mad Max, the movie comes closer to what I think the world would be like after nuclear holocaust. Another movie that comes to mind is the Sci-fi flick , I can't remember the name, with Kurt Russell as the hero prisoner with a GPS wristwatch, in NY, that has a limited time to kill a gang leader, or something like that before Kurt's toast. My point is, some people will live and the quality of life will s**k because of radiation poisoning, carrion and rodent diseases and having to live by your wits. In contrast, the world leaders will be safely tucked away in their Rocky Mtn bunker fortress, especially the G-8, that used to be G-12? Anyway, yes some will live and a few will have it a h*ll of a lot better than the 'little people'!
If there was a WW3 in, let's say 2 years, then basically what would happen is no country would win, everybody would lose. Because with the nuclear capabilities of today we'd probably end up destroying everybody in the course of WW3. So...nobody would win. Srsly.
woah woah woah wait a second...... i personally think there will be a world war 3 but way later like after our childrens children have died. but America would obviously win because who has won the last two? and WTF stop talking about ww3 and who would win people can see threads.....like nazis duh
If we assume that someone gets out of hand and uses nukes(chance of that happening =???/100 in the year ????, as of right now though 99/100), I assume then we will all die because Russia and USA both have enough nukes and explosives to (each of them) destroy the surface of the Earth three times over. twenty years ago it would have been five.
you think america has as few nukes as it says, or is that just what were saying. because i don't remember letting hans brinx in here and inspect anything.
In the event of a non nuclear war the winner would be NATO. Nato has some of the best equipped armies in the world. People say that China would win but in reality the Chinese forces are not very well trained or led they just have a lot of people. The US army is big with over a million soldier as well as some of the best and most moden equipment in the world(M1A2, F22 etc). For the European forces we have Germany which is also a very well equipped force as well as Britain, France, Spain as well as many other countries with good militaries. Most other countries like Russia, North Korea, Iran and other countries that we see as the "Bad Guys" do not have alliances that are nearly this powerful.
In the event of a nuclear war there would be nor winners. everything would be nuked. Even Switzerland as some people have stated would not surviver because it is surrounded my NATO members. The Dust and radiation would wipe out everything living thing on the planet except for the farthest reaches of the ocean
China stormed the UN forces with sheer numbers and pushed them back to the current boundary.
The F-22 costs waaaaaaaaaaaay too much to actually be used, and the F-35 is a little worse than the F-22 in some aspects.
And it's only a matter of time before the next technology breakthrough happens that kills stealth tech (it is WW THREE after all, some time for technology to progress)
The F-35 is a 5th gen fighter...also happens to be the planned fighter for much of NATO. Russia and China are each developing their own 5th gen fighters, so it's even there.
Aaaaand everyone already has a 3rd generation tank, though NATO has Chobham armor...developed in the 1960s, so everyone else prolly already has ceramic armor.
China's DF21 can kill a carrier before a carrier can kill it.
Anyway, NATO might win due to the coalition of separate nations...
