I saw this topic about burnt to death or freeze to death and i thought, what would you choose, no arms or no legs?
I would choose no arms, because you can still walk and run, but it's very difficult because people have to help you a lot, you can't wash yourself without your arms..
I'd choose no legs, the prosthetic robot hands I've seen work too slow for my tastes, and some of the legs actually look like fun to use, when you forget all of the pain and discomfort that someone would have to go through.
None of you type with your feet.
That doesn't mean I can't. Would be a pain to use a mouse, though.
The obvious choice is legs. Prosthetic legs work much more conveniently as replacements for legs than prosthetic arms do for arms. We do a lot more things with our arms.
id choose no legs. i can still travel with a wheelchair. if you had no arms, then you would have no hands. and if you have no hands, then you can barely do anything by yourself. and i need my hands in order to type and click, i cant do that with my toes! lol
my dream job would be burnt as i need both my arms and legs... and my second dream job also requires both... i have no idea which one id rather loose.. arms or legs
my dream job would be burnt as i need both my arms and legs... and my second dream job also requires both... i have no idea which one id rather loose.. arms or legs
Yea that quite sucks.. if i may ask: what's your dream job?
