Instead of ignoring the troll, beat em.
My reply is directly to @Everdead.
Trolls use no grammar.
While....
Constructively Awesome Flamers do.
"Trolling is trying to get a rise out of someone. Forcing them to respond to you, either through wise-crackery, posting incorrect information, asking blatantly stupid questions, or other foolishness. However, trolling statements are never true or are ever meant to be construed as such. Nearly all trolled statements are meant to be funny to some people, so it does have some social/entertainment value"
Flamer: "A very, sometimes exceptionally, rude person mostly found in forums. These persons will use foul language against persons who might have mispelled a word or have another opinion."
AG has a very clear policy on
Flaming and Trolling so i wouldn't publicly announce that you're a flamer.
And now back to the topic at hand]
So God made Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve, so Eve+Eve=Nothing, as does steve+steve. Clearly
Adoption and
IVF don't equal nothing. So therefore Gay people can have kids and therefore contribute in a family and social way in their community.
You argue that the Bible says it is wrong, but the Bible always contradicts itself. Have you ever read the song of songs/song of Solomon. Although a hetrosexual passage, it promotes the right to free love and does not state any sexuality being excluded. Now this, a passage so intense and rather a bit too intimate would be the perfect place for a sexuality law, don't you think? & before you reply "Leviticus 18", i am perfectly aware there are passages in the Bible that do mention that homosexuality is a sin. But isn't it true that God did not write the bible, mhm. Casual men and women wrote the Bible, with individual characteristics. An author of one book was perhaps not a homophobe, the other perhaps was. It's the rule of man, not God.
Gay marriage will promote homosexuality? If you opinion is that being straight is to promote this straightness, then you can't really use the Christian argument as you're completely arguing against the marriage is solely for love thing.
Also by thinking you have to kill millions of people breaks your religion argument further - you clearly don't know the text as well as you think if you missed out the "thou shalt not kill" bit, because from what i've learned, that bit was pretty important.
Your argument about lesbians was the way they present themselves. What has looks got to do with sexuality? Not to mention to mentioned the colour of someone being black which is highly irrelevant. I'm a lesbian and trust me i'm not butch or with very short hair. I have long hair, love make up and enjoy putting my dress and heels on and spending time, you know, like a normal person. (Because obviously me being a flaming homo makes me abnormal)
So there's something to think of little guy.
