Forums → WEPR → Gay Marriage-Should it be Legal or not?
561 | 107125 |
- 561 Replies
561 | 107125 |
I personally think that it should be legal cause it doesnt hurt anybody and everyone has the right to marry who they love.
also, strop, how have i warranted a warning over any other. please advise...
a gay marriage does not make sense. a marriage as defined in miriam websters dictionary up until the late 90's
i asked strop. please do not stick your nose where it does not belong. and i said in the late 90's to illistrate how this country has let all of its moral go so that we don't 'huwt anyones feewings'
its not equal, im not better they are not better, but it shouldn't be a marriage if its not a man and a woman. thats my opinion, your attempts to change it are futile. thats it.
, but it shouldn't be a marriage if its not a man and a woman
who made you the master of definitions.
not even going to comment, but besides that, until the gays made a big stink about being left out, and the lawyers got invloved, everyone(except the gays of course) were totally fine with marriage being between a man and a woman, and furthermore, if religion is out, then why is it so common to be married by a priest, in a church.
not even going to comment, but besides that, until the gays made a big stink about being left out, and the lawyers got invloved, everyone(except the gays of course) were totally fine with marriage being between a man and a woman, and furthermore, if religion is out, then why is it so common to be married by a priest, in a church.
were still talking about america right? or has this debate gone global. im not sure how communist look at gays, but im guessing not fondly. and besides that, there were a whole bunch of white people that were on the blacks side. besides, it is still my opinion until it is proven with hard evidence, that gays chose it. blacks don't. i laugh at the guy who found the gay gene only because he is the same guy who discovered the 'fat gene'.
also how do you explain the years before america, when mariage was between you and god, and there were no courthouses. but it was still religious and only between a man and a woman.
were still talking about america right? or has this debate gone global. im not sure how communist look at gays, but im guessing not fondly
and besides that, there were a whole bunch of white people that were on the blacks side.
it is still my opinion until it is proven with hard evidence
also how do you explain the years before america, when mariage was between you and god, and there were no courthouses. but it was still religious and only between a man and a woman.
The legal or religious ceremony that formalizes the decision of two people to live as a married couple, including the accompanying social festivities
also how do you explain the years before america, when mariage was between you and god, and there were no courthouses. but it was still religious and only between a man and a woman.
i have grown up to think it is just gross.
a gay marriage does not make sense. a marriage as defined in miriam websters dictionary up until the late 90's is a commitment between a man and a woman.
if religion is out, then why is it so common to be married by a priest, in a church.
$cientology center
were still talking about america right?
You must be logged in to post a reply!