ForumsWEPRAre you scared of a New World?

41 8087
AnaLoGMunKy
offline
AnaLoGMunKy
1,573 posts
Blacksmith

So the world is changing.

Does it worry you?

This topic is in part about the rapid progress within the world and also about humanity having the best opportunities yet wasting them on individuals and logo's. Mage wrote a topic about "faceless inividuals" with a concern that we are merely following the herd, wearing the clothes that are socially acceptable (for the era) and claiming equality thru it all. Im worried about the mindless junk that is repeated on TV and Radio and I think it ties in directly.

This leads me to manipulation. We all manipulate. Its not a bad thing. However I am quite alarmed by the amount of social manipulation that has gone on with advertising and its many, many facets. Merely watch the second part of Century of the Self to gain an understanding on how Government and Corporation have both manipulated mass population into doing things like making women smoke. (I highly suggest the whole program)

I know that I tar government and corporations with the same black, greasy lie infested brush but can you blame me?

Anyone with a shred of intellect and who has studied and looked for the truth will agree that governments lie and so do corporations. The fact that individuals within these organisations have lied repeatedly for personal gain and to the detriment of all should be enough to cause dissent. Yet I am usually tagged as a "conspiracy theorist" or "anarchist" for voicing my concerns. Does my worry hold no weight?

Sometimes humans do a good thing by bringing each other back into line. Sometimes we cause great injustice by threat of alienation if someone speaks up.

And so once again the majority sit back and sink into blissful ignorance while a supposed "depression" goes on. Yet some people are richer than ever, the divide between rich and poor is greater, inflation has gone out of control and good food gets more and more expensive, drugs that help people are withheld and we are told that we cannot ingest "illegal drugs" on threat of criminalisation, jail... or far worse.

So perhaps my message of discontent is not for us all. Some people look on the bright side. Some people look to the light... others look directly AT the light. How does one person address all these things without having some foolproof plan and an argument backed up by endless links to other peoples finding that are all suspect anyway, especially if you dont want to believe the information.

So... How would you convey a message of the times?

How would you say it?

  • 41 Replies
Einfach
offline
Einfach
1,448 posts
Nomad

Sorry - I should rephrase the challenge - Give me an example of an action that someone does that they think will further their happiness, regardless if it ultimately does or not.

AnaLoGMunKy
offline
AnaLoGMunKy
1,573 posts
Blacksmith

Give me an example of an action that someone does that they think will further their happiness, regardless if it ultimately does or not.


Thats the same thing.
Einfach
offline
Einfach
1,448 posts
Nomad

Well, the woman described believed she would be happier with the product she bought than with the money unspent. Even though this is a bad choice on her part, it was a choice after all. She thought it would make her happier. Why should you interfere with a person's perception what what they think will make them happier?

AnaLoGMunKy
offline
AnaLoGMunKy
1,573 posts
Blacksmith

Why should you interfere with a person's perception what what they think will make them happier?


I want people to realise the things in life that really DO make them happier. How dare the advertiser interfere with OUR perception of what makes us happy. What makes you so annoyed? The fact that Im insinuating you dont have a true grasp of the world or the fact that Im attacking your perception of the world which I suspect is a rose tinted one (I dont mean well off or judging you as a person but from what you say it seems as if your thoughts are within a bubble and I am a prick... a pin prick.)

And if all I say is suspect and wrong then why not the rest of the world? Especially the people who would promise you happiness from... I dont know, from something thats obviously not working within a western culture that has a huge imputus on collecting gadgets and upgrades (I too, love a good upgrade).

I guess this thread is about manipulation and ways we can better understand the world around us to manipulate it for the better. A truly nice person would manipulate to cause long term happiness. This is not happening right now. All we see is short term gain and it preys on our immediate fears of our perceptions of ourselves, how we act, our looks, how we appear to others... I would like a bit of space from this attack on my senses and be allowed to grow with a comfort. I learned of the world and withdrew rapidly into a shell. Now I am appearing again armed with the luck of amazing friends around me and also there are people within these forums who have a critical eye and dont try to put people down to better themselves.

In all honesty I look for truth. I dont see any truth in letting the woman buy the makeup with a false perception of happiness.
NoNameC68
offline
NoNameC68
5,043 posts
Shepherd

Are you happy that oil companies are raking in the profit


Profit is good.

whilst charging ever higher prices on petrol?


It's odd, I don't really know what the reason is behind high gas prices. Gas is cheaper in America than the rest of the world though.

corporations dominate the market?


That's like saying dogs dominate dog shows. If you're in the market, you are most likely going to be in some sort of corporation. I am assuming you mean big corporations dominate the market? A corporation has to be big to dominate a market.

I looked on the back of a packet of supermarkets own brand cornflakes today and it shows an image of a happy family. It almost doesnt matter what the text is, the idea they wish to convey is clear... good for you and your family. I dont need advertising people to tell me what food is good and in fact I dont want them to because with the same foul swipe of their hand they will put happy funny bouncy YAY! images on sweets so kids perk up when they see them or put a catchy tune to crap filled pop tarts so I think of them, sing it, see it, get good feeling.


This is manipulation, I do agree. But is it wrong? If you want someone to buy your product you want to make it exciting and appealing. Sure, maybe you're stretching the truth by adding a mascot. Is that so wrong? Captain Crunch isn't really that good for you, so should we take the Captain off the box? Should we also remove the Green Giant from frozen veggie goods?

I believe the best way to talk about manipulation is from a philosophical approach. Manipulation can be used for right and wrong, and it is hard to determine these rights and wrongs. Even more so, we must determine if people should be allowed to manipulate and how much they may manipulate and how to enforce such manipulations.

I still have to watch Zeitgeist, as I have avoided doing so a few times in the past.

The Corporation link you provided actually disappointed me some. Corporations wanted to expand, so they used the 14th amendment to do so, even though the 14th amendment was not written for them but for blacks. That doesn't make corporations evil, it merely means they wanted more room so they could have more &quotower", or what I like to call it, "opportunities". The clip itself included forms of manipulation. One lady in the clip said corporations wanted more power. I could be reading her words wrong, but she said &quotower" as if power is evil and only weak people should be able to acquire power.

Please, pick up the book The 48 Laws of Power. As you learn about power, you may see it in a different light.

Corporations provide us with goods that we all enjoy. Even if the goods aren't healthy for us or good for us in any way, we should still be able to acquire those goods. You're arguing that people can't be trusted to make the right decisions if they are being manipulated, so someone needs to stop the manipulations. This just puts us in a huge loop and it's easier to simply allow the people to be manipulated and for you yourself to educate them yourself.
Einfach
offline
Einfach
1,448 posts
Nomad

Profit is the result of mutually beneficial trades. When you buy something, do you think the item (and what you could have done with the item) or the money (and what you could have done with that money) benefits you more?

About the person who was deceived through manipulation. First, if an advertising company lies, that's false advertising - that is wrong. But using advertising techniques where nothing untrue is said is perfectly legitimate.

crazenird
offline
crazenird
329 posts
Nomad

As long as the new world has black ops I'll be ok.


What if there is no Xbox 360s or PS3s? OH NO!!!!!!

As long as Canadians aren't running it


haha
AnaLoGMunKy
offline
AnaLoGMunKy
1,573 posts
Blacksmith

Profit is good.


Depends who profits and how.

It's odd, I don't really know what the reason is behind high gas prices. Gas is cheaper in America than the rest of the world though.


Than the rest of the western world maybe.
I believe the best way to talk about manipulation is from a philosophical approach. Manipulation can be used for right and wrong, and it is hard to determine these rights and wrongs. Even more so, we must determine if people should be allowed to manipulate and how much they may manipulate and how to enforce such manipulations.


I think this could well be a good approach. I am sick of seeing it everywhere tho and someones gotta push back.

Profit is the result of mutually beneficial trades.

But using advertising techniques where nothing untrue is said is perfectly legitimate.


Ok... so we get into law here. Saying a product has no added flavourings etc etc is quite normal. But lots of countries dont have a law against the flavourings being added outside the country by another company.
e.g. Company A in juiceland makes kids juice. They buy their juice concentrate from Company B in jellyland. Company B puts flavourings and all sorts in the concentrate. Company A, by law, can say no ADDED blah because company A didnt put it there. But its there. And they dont even have to list it on the ingredients.

So strictly speaking its not lying... by law... but really it is, just not by law. And this makes it fair and ok?!?

The Corporation link you provided actually disappointed me some. Corporations wanted to expand, so they used the 14th amendment to do so, even though the 14th amendment was not written for them but for blacks. That doesn't make corporations evil, it merely means they wanted more room so they could have more &quotower", or what I like to call it, "opportunities".


Did you watch the whole thing?

The clip itself included forms of manipulation.


Why is it that someone is always quick to point out the manipulation that a program such as this uses to make a point as if it is worthy of dismissal and debunking and yet defends the manipulation that a government/corporation uses.

Watch Zeitgeist. It too bends the truth, but the things it speaks about are important.
AnaLoGMunKy
offline
AnaLoGMunKy
1,573 posts
Blacksmith

Sorry for the dp but realised I missed this.

You're arguing that people can't be trusted to make the right decisions if they are being manipulated, so someone needs to stop the manipulations. This just puts us in a huge loop and it's easier to simply allow the people to be manipulated and for you yourself to educate them yourself.


Im not arguing that people cannot be trusted to make decisions. Have you tried talking to people about this? You guys can at least see the manipulation is there... most ppl dont even wanna admit that it happens. They put blinkers on and turn devils advocate... which is still happening to some degree in here.

Where do we draw the line. Lets take a purely hypothetical e.g.

Is killing your population to manipulate them into a war by blaming the "enemy" and painting an untruthful picture of them as oppressors and boogiemen ok. Because there is a line most people would say is not to be crossed as it breaks their trust.

How is this any different from what we see every day. We are given "boogie men" and the medicine to fight them, we are told this product can help increase your health because by law the words "can help" does not actually mean can... it means "could"...

So until they start teaching about this kind of wordplay and manipulation in schools to kids then there is no hope of "educating them myself".
NoNameC68
offline
NoNameC68
5,043 posts
Shepherd

Did you watch the whole thing?


No, I was talking specifically about the clip. I should have been more clear that I watched only that single clip. I did not mean to sound as if I was judging the video as a whole.

So strictly speaking its not lying... by law... but really it is, just not by law. And this makes it fair and ok?!?


This should be illegal. I will agree.

Why is it that someone is always quick to point out the manipulation that a program such as this uses to make a point as if it is worthy of dismissal and debunking and yet defends the manipulation that a government/corporation uses.


It's merely to point out that manipulation is everywhere. Manipulation in general is not wrong or right, but a tool. Sometimes we manipulate situations without even noticing.

Is killing your population to manipulate them into a war by blaming the "enemy" and painting an untruthful picture of them as oppressors and boogiemen ok. Because there is a line most people would say is not to be crossed as it breaks their trust.


Manipulation is being used as a tool for war. Manipulation is not a physical object, which makes it even harder to talk about.

Manipulation is tricky though, because any time we become aware we are being manipulated, we either blow it off or we become offended. Rarely does manipulation work to the point where you can state you support it.

When you talk about manipulation, you are talking about how people abuse it. It's hard to attack manipulation when the focus should be the offenders themselves. I don't intend on watching the video about corporations, but I'll leave you a message on your profile if and when i get to watching Zeitgeist.

"can help" does not actually mean can... it means "could"...


I believe "can" may also present one's ability to acheive, rather than the fact that it will succeed. It's an iffy word, but I know what you mean.

Here's an example you'll dig. I heard someone ranting about honey and how one product stated that their brand of honey is fat free. Why did this claim cause such a stir? It's because all honey is fat free. That's the kind of manipulation you are talking about.

It's horrible, and people are suckered into these kinds of traps. I believe the fairest way to combat such manipulation should be through being informative. Let's look at movies, there are plenty of sources that rate movies so you know which ones are good before you even have to watch them. When it comes to politics, people have their own ideas of what works and does not work. Politics, unlike science, does not have any answers that are clearly observable and agreeable because sooo many things affect each other. There's A LOT of manipulation when it comes to politics, and it's incredibly hard to argue such manipulation. Trust me, I have tried. Manipulation is normal when it comes to romance, and sometimes we must allow ourselves to be manipulated or, play along.

I'm not really disagreeing with you, but manipulation is a tool and it's hard to attack a tool when it's easier to attack the manipulator, because we are all manipulators to some degree. Believe it or not, some people believe manipulation is a part of being a moderator on AG.

This topic is about the new world, and people use manipulation to get what they want. As I said earlier, manipulation has always existed. The only reason there is more manipulation is because we are exposed to more people, products, and programs than ever before. It's inevitable.

I know very little about this scenario, but at one point in time, a king sent thousands of children to their death because he told everyone that only children may enter into the garden of Edan. I'll look into the scenario and talk about it some more later on.
AnaLoGMunKy
offline
AnaLoGMunKy
1,573 posts
Blacksmith

Believe it or not, some people believe manipulation is a part of being a moderator on AG.


And I agree that it is. I also think that like anyone with, and I dont know how to put this, more of a say, more status, should use manipulation. I also believe they have more responsibility because with great power comes great responsibility (Tobey Maguire just jumped across my minds eye).

Here's an example you'll dig. I heard someone ranting about honey and how one product stated that their brand of honey is fat free. Why did this claim cause such a stir? It's because all honey is fat free. That's the kind of manipulation you are talking about.


You got the nail on the head.

I dont fault people for a sukker punch when it happens occasionally but this is almost constant and this is where my main annoyance lies. Im also not against advertising a product but advertising is not whats happening in most cases where adverts are literally engineered to cause fear and envy then act as if they are providing a solution to it.

I think for the purpose of this thread its much more important that you watch "century of the self". I have seen Happiness machines and The engineering of consent. They really blew me away. I knew all this stuff happened but it was like having an education on how and who. It is a program about manipulation and the good and bad that comes of it even when its done with peoples best interests. Anna Freud, Sigmund Freud daughter, truly believed that if people were manipulated and controlled to act within social standards then they would become happier people. The initial problem that springs to my mind is "what are acceptable social standards"... its like what you mentioned about politics, you cannot define it and there is no real &quotroof" that one view/way is right over another. Another problem was that people dont like being pushed, they like being led. The best way to manipulate is to lead, like a moderator that leads someone away from red hot angry debate to a more thoughtful and engaging one. I really feel that we are being pushed into things and not being lead with consent.

All I have to do is see my achievements and failings in bringing up my child and I see that leading with a positive and truthful example is better than condemning actions and tricking him to my design.
jroyster22
offline
jroyster22
755 posts
Peasant

The world has become what it is today simply because of manipulation, and people or groups becoming more selfish in their own hidden agendas. As far as a new world or a new world order, I believe that plan has already been put in place to take action. However, just because a plan has been put into action does not mean it will actually work!

JohnsBiggestFan
offline
JohnsBiggestFan
97 posts
Nomad

Im newworldophobic

Somewhat49
offline
Somewhat49
1,606 posts
Nomad

I've tried manipulating people before (not into something serious, I just wanted to test it) and it's scary how easily people can be manipulated. Also I think it's not that bad if people are manipulated because without manipulation there would be no government. Someone had to manipulate others into making and following rules. Yes somketimes people take it too far and become infamous but mostly it's on the borderline.

As for advertising, it's there job and how else will they sell their product? Moving with the pack is not that bad as long as you stick to your principles and don't lose your personality.

AnaLoGMunKy
offline
AnaLoGMunKy
1,573 posts
Blacksmith

The world has become what it is today simply because of manipulation, and people or groups becoming more selfish in their own hidden agendas. As far as a new world or a new world order, I believe that plan has already been put in place to take action. However, just because a plan has been put into action does not mean it will actually work!


Due to people being unpredictable I would deffo agree. I guess one of my interests is to bring the idea to light in people who would dismiss it as mere conspiracy. Thats kinda what I meant in my OP when I said I get continuously dismissed as a conspiracy theorist etc... sure there is an element I add because of my distrust of corps and government agencies but due to their actions my lack of trust is well founded, tho not always well placed.

As for advertising, it's there job and how else will they sell their product?


I dont mind someone upselling their products. I do mind the things advertising is allowed to do to sell something. They are allowed to do and say things that amount to lies but by law are accepted as technically true. Its almost normal now for me to differentiate between the word "can" when said by people or by adverts. When said by people it generally means "yes, I can". When said by an advert it means "It could, maybe, but only if you read the small print" etc

So manipulation and lying in people is normal but lying when done by a supermassive corporation is a dangerous thing for us all.
Showing 16-30 of 41