I answered your questions, that isn't changing the story. The analogy does work.
If you add more things to the analogy because I asked something, then yes, that is changing the story. The fact that I found a problem with it shows that it wasn't *perfect* like you claimed earlier.
But it's best to do some research on the matter before even talking about it.
Like clicking on community to check for a few threads on Exit Path, but I doubt that they'll do that since they are guests and they most likely don't have AG accounts. Nonetheless, it's better to ask questions around the game rather than calling everyone that's faster than you a hacker.
It isn't just the people that do the double jumps that get labeled a hacker, it's the people that are faster than you as well. See that level 41 in my image, he got called a hacker and he can't even perform the double jump.
Which is why it's not a good idea to overgeneralise things.Hell, I've had someone accuse me of cheating even though he KNEW how to double jump himself. However, saying *most* people act this way simply isn't true, since most of the players are actually quiet.
From my experience on Exit Path, the experienced players that utilize the double jump don't do that.
My experience tells me otherwise, so this becomes a moot point for the both of us.
Videos don't explain it well, but Serville's video explains it a bit, he adds a description to each video.
I checked those and he never goes into much detail, apart from "use dj for this level". Having said that, I found a comment of his *somewhat* explaining it, but still not enough for a complete newbie to pick up.
Rise as in response? Not sure what you're trying to say.
"to get a rise out of someone" as in "to get a reaction from someone"
Can't hug a wall on Exit Path, unless you use the stick glitch. But that's not what this discussion is for, we are talking about racing, not tricks.
That wasn't the point. If you really want to pointlessly argue semantics, you may change it to "Gaining an additional jump is most likely hacking. Use common sense." to make my point even more obvious.
I never talked in chat up until they started calling me a hacker. I was just playing the game for two reasons. One, to practice because I haven't played in a while, two, to observe the game, which means to see if I would get talked to. I wasn't going out there solely for a reaction, they started it. I wasn't trolling.
This isn't what you said the first time.
I just got on for a few minutes to test something, and to practice maps. What I was testing was looking for newcomers/inexperienced players then see what they would say to me.
Hmmmmmm,it seems you DID play to get a reaction,because otherwise that post wouldn't exist. You even took pictures as evidence and everything.
There's really no point in denying it, since you flat out said yourself that you intended to get reactions.
I was comparing matches. With matches comes experience, if you have a lot of matches then you've played the game quite a lot, thus the experience.
And I already said that 184 matches (which is the highest non-grandmaster) isn't a lot. Ergo, not experienced.
Glitch =/= hacking.
That was my point. So thanks for repeating it.
You still haven't given me a reason why the *flow hack* couldn't be a really obscure glitch.
The game has been out a while. A lot of people have played this game, some more than others. If there was supposedly a glitch that allowed unlimited flow in the game, then I'd think that it would be found out by now. Someone would've posted about it. Being able to use flow by tampering with the game is hacking. Being able to double jump isn't hacking, it was found out in the game, which makes it a glitch.
That's what you think. Since new routes and tricks are still being found, there's absolutely no way to know for sure. It wouldn't even need to be a glitch for *unlimited* flow. One that starts you with a full bar(or the amount you had last race) could easily have the same effect.
I never called the hackers of the game uncivilized nor unintelligent. Your argument is invalid.
I never said that. I DID say you used that to describe people that "jumped to conclusions" i.e that *dared* call you a hacker.
Here's s'more quotes:
A civilized individual would ask questions, but these immature children or adults on Exit Path just go out and call hacker at everyone that finishes quickly.
>Implying they are not civilized and immature.
For them to just straight out call someone a hacker repeatedly is stupid.
>Calling their actions stupid.
You're quoting everything I post in this discussion. We are having this discussion, nobody else has entered it. You are asking me questions.
So that brings me to believe that this argument is for me.
Naturally, it goes to follow that my criticism applies to everyone with a similar stance.
It's not jumping to conclusions, it's true. I post about a hacker that had nothing to do with this discussion of being called one, then you come out and argue about it.
While your buddies at Ghosts chat call people hackers pages back and you say nothing. Which brings me to my point. You're welcome.
I'd dig up that definition of ignorance but I'm sure you still know it. I've argued with you for a while now. This hacking thing was just part of the whole thing. If you haven't noticed, I usually reply to every post I feel like responding to as a large text wall. I just took the liberty of adressing the issues I had with that post.
Also, feel free to post some actual examples and I'd gladly comment on those.
Doesn't look that way to me.
DO tell why I'd *hate* you. If someone made those exact posts, you can be **** sure I would've adressed them if I noticed them. But I'm not going to search through 156 pages to find stuff.
Don't be so arrogant to believe I hate or stalk you just because I point out the flaws in your logic. I'd do the same to everyone else.
However, in the flash games sub-forum, you seem to stalk my posts.
-.-
Let's try this again.
The reason I only post on the flash games forum is because
a) Other boards overanylize things I don't care for or are generally uninteresting
b) Other boards are pointless and/or spam
c) Other boards are filled with fanboys (you know the one)
Seeing that Exit Path is the only reason I'm staying on this site and most other peeps frequent this place, it only makes sense I'd be generally easier to find on this board.
As for you, I generally quote you because your posts have the most substance to them (regardless of whether I agree or not) and I know you'll actually respond.
THERE's your reason. Not some make-believe hate story.
You can share your opinion on the matter, yes, but you can't force your opinion onto someone else.
It isn't going to work.
Correcting and finding flaws in your reasoning is not forcing my opinion on you. When I share my opinion, I'm usually make sure that it is easily recognised as such.
But sure, I'll play this game: Name one instance where I *forced my opinion* on you. And no correcting you isn't such an instance, unless you can show it was opinion and not something else.
And funny you should mention that since I found this little thing on that thread you posted:
That's what most newcomers to the game say. It isn't cheating. It's something that the more experienced players of the game have found and can be used to make your times faster.
(It's on page 2 btw)
Right hereNot only does that make you come of as arrogant, it's also forcing your opinion on someone.
I could make another post this size about how the double jump can be considered cheating and that it shouldn't be discounted as such *because experienced people use it*, but I'll refrain from doing so right now. If anyone -really- wants me to, I can elaborate.
Being quoted, then the other person posting a wall of text, I feel obliged to reply so that they can better understand my intention.
That's what I said, your fault.
So, can we stop the walls of text about moral discussions and talk about what the forum is ABOUT: EXIT PATH.
Oh I'd LOVE to, but there isn't any topic that has any sort of depth to it. If you supply one that isn't summed up in a one-word response, then yes, I'd make a comment.
And no, "your favourite colour" or "what do you think about hacking" is not a discussion, as much as it is giving your opinion. The hacking thing HAS potential(since it IS part of my argument right now), if you provide something to actually *debate* about it.
What are your opinions on full-body flair in EP2?
Meh. Has potential I suppose, but it ultimately depends.
I wonder if anyone besides Kenty and I are reading each-others posts. I bet that everyone else is just waiting until the discussion is over, or are just waiting for the discussion to change.
Do I care? Like I said, give me something to actually talk about, and I shall do so. Besides, it's their own fault since I reply to them in there ;P
Not like reading is a bad thing >_>
I find three months to be while. And my post wasn't geared towards tricks/glitches that have been already found out.
Two months and a week, to be a little picky. Considering the game is almost out for a year now, that really isn't a lot of time, especially since people already thought they knew everything half a year ago. Finding new things is not impossible, even with the game being out for a while now.