here we disprove evelotion(i think i misspelld it) an evelotioninist can come and defen himself so here we go.and you know wat i can disprove it with one fact. the odds of pepole evolving is somthig like 1 in 10 to the 1000 power oh and scientist only consiter an event with the posibilaty of 1 in 10 to the 50 power wich means it cant happen
We are taking your points into consideration - it's just that they aren't valid or reliable, nor do they stand up to the sheer volume and scale of our evidence, so your evidence is knocked down.
Idiot22 and Zach-whatever-your-name-is, you are wrong. There are over 130 years of information you prove you wrong.
You insist on saying that they are not listening to you, but they are. You are too ignorant too realize that what you are saying is wrong. Just because they are pointing that out, does not mean they don't understand, but are rather understanding too well.
Besides, your grammar, your education, and the fact that you were held back three times does not qualify you to challenge a theory backed up so many times.
Also, calling everyone "einstein wannabes" enforces the idea that you are ignorant. Not everyone is an "einstein" just because you are not smarter than them. You are degrading the name, the people's knowledge, and ruining your image.
Whatever I say may not affect you very much, but what I am saying is not wrong. Learn to be mindful of other ideas, but learn to be mindful of times when you are wrong.
Look... I'm a frickin enrichment student and i was NEVER held back. I was born in 1998 and zach in 1999. so shut up about the "held back" thing because we are enrichment students. and besides, the "knowledge" that you guys THINK you have is a bunch of crap. I'm 12 right now and i know about as much as a frickin 6th or 7th grader and in 4th grade the principal asked if i wanted to skip 4th grade and i said no because i wanted to be with my friends. So this is pretty pointless
Look... I'm a frickin enrichment student and i was NEVER held back. I was born in 1998 and zach in 1999. so shut up about the "held back" thing because we are enrichment students. and besides, the "knowledge" that you guys THINK you have is a bunch of crap. I'm 12 right now and i know about as much as a frickin 6th or 7th grader and in 4th grade the principal asked if i wanted to skip 4th grade and i said no because i wanted to be with my friends. So this is pretty pointless
Cool. Now demonstrate all your knowledge and learn to quote things.
I'm 12 right now and i know about as much as a frickin 6th or 7th grader and in 4th grade the principal asked if i wanted to skip 4th grade and i said no because i wanted to be with my friends. So this is pretty pointless
Twelve year olds would be in the 6th or 7th grade, that means you're normal if you know as much as a 6th or 7th grader. Normal isn't anything to be boasting about. I'm your age, and judging by your grammar, I'd say you are pretty normal for the aforementioned age. Just jumping in.
the odds of pepole evolving is somthig like 1 in 10 to the 1000 power oh and scientist only consiter an event with the posibilaty of 1 in 10 to the 50 power wich means it cant happen
First things first: where are you getting this information?
I'm 12 right now and i know about as much as a frickin 6th or 7th grader
Yeah, well, I'm 19 right now, so I know more than a frickin 6th or 7th grader, and I'm telling you that you need to learn how to use common sense and manners if you want to discuss stuff.
Think of it like this.
You know you're right. The person you're arguing with knows he's right. You cannot both be right.
Now, one of you is obviously wrong. Since you both are certain you are right, you cannot simply claim you are right because you know so, because the other person would do the same. What you both need to do is keep in mind that even though you might be right, there is also a possibility that you are wrong, and refusing to accept that is not only arrogant, stupid and ignorant, it is also a great way to kill a discussion.
What you need to do is to convince the other person that what you believe is true, but you also need to give them a chance to convince you, and not just dismiss everything they say as nonsense.
Now, I don't really know you, but I can tell something right away. I don't if you are smarter than an average 12 years old, but even if you are, you still act just like one.
I didnt post that. A friend of mine named Zach did
I realize that, but it would seem that you are arguing on his behalf. It was directed to either of you. And I see how you seem to be ignoring everything but the one thing you think you can answer easily.
I read the crap but the same people say the same crap and I'm only ignoring the einstein pretenders because they blab about random stuff.
The entire point of an argument is to respond to your opponents' points, not to go "Lalalalayou'reallsayingthesamestufflalalalala" and not listen to them. They are clearly arguing in a coherent manner and you're ignoring them.
I and him are arguing on EACH OTHERS behalf. Why he's not here now is because he's busy.
If you are arguing on each others' behalf, why is it that you seem incapable of responding to a question in regards to his prior statement? Isn't that the entire point of arguing on someone's behalf, to "fill their boots", per se?
