ForumsWEPRSexting

84 25111
Sonatavarius
offline
Sonatavarius
1,322 posts
Farmer

wiki

I'm sitting here watching the news and all of a sudden the people start talking about children sexting each other... apparently it has some people freaking out. Its a big enough issue that some states are trying to make laws about it. Sexting is defined by them as not only being words... but sending images of themselves. Thus they call it distribution of child pornography and possession of child pornography.

They've talked about jail time, classes (akin to driving school kinda classes...but w/ sexting >_&gt , fining the parents, whether or not to give the kid a criminal record.... does anyone have any further insight into the situation? does anyone have anything that they would like to say that either agrees or disagrees w/ the other people's suggestions? do you have any suggestions? ...or do you care?

  • 84 Replies
master565
offline
master565
4,104 posts
Nomad

Why don't phone companies just give parents the choice of wether or not to screen profanity in kids texts.

loloynage2
offline
loloynage2
4,206 posts
Peasant

Why don't phone companies just give parents the choice of wether or not to screen profanity in kids texts.

Why would companies waste their own money and efforts on a couple of paranoiac parents?
master565
offline
master565
4,104 posts
Nomad

Why would companies waste their own money and efforts on a couple of paranoiac parents?


Because parents might have to stop their kids from texting if they don't.
loloynage2
offline
loloynage2
4,206 posts
Peasant

Because parents might have to stop their kids from texting if they don't.

so...?
master565
offline
master565
4,104 posts
Nomad

so...?


They lose money from parents not paying for their kids to text...
Pemberton20
offline
Pemberton20
35 posts
Nomad

I find this completely absurd. I am 16 and I can't believe I can do all these things with girls but still can't keep a picture? I could have 3 girls over to do things and it's still not considered illegal when I just have 1 harmless picture that doesn't involve getting another girl pregnant.. America has stooped to it's lowest. Maybe they can say anyone that is 18+ can't contain possession of anyone under 18? Maybe they can change the rules to that you can be 16 for pictures and consent because either way I am going to have sex whether it's my hand or not.

loloynage2
offline
loloynage2
4,206 posts
Peasant

They lose money from parents not paying for their kids to text...

A couple of kids not having cellphones...big deal.
zakyman
offline
zakyman
1,627 posts
Peasant

What I know is that if you send it and someone is offended, it is a class-5 felony, if that is redistrubuted you can also be charged with a class-3 felony, if I remember it right

xfirealchemistx
offline
xfirealchemistx
370 posts
Nomad

This is retarded.

They're kids looking at kids. Get over it.


I agree but if it's kids sexting to a person over a certain age then it's completely different.
Showing 76-84 of 84