If Christianity had not found root in ancient Rome would we have the bible? No.
Casuistic argument, with a false-by-default statement - declined.
A lure of religion is the idea of redeeming a guilty conscience.
Yes, though Christianity is centered on the idea of "do what you want others to do to you" which was revolutionary by the time of it appearing and is still actual today.
A political tool (the bible) is not evidence.
Prove your point of the Bible being a political tool. Also check Kumran texts, originating in ~1AD, they comply with what the Bible says, thus they act as evidence of it having truth inside.
If God was as the average Christian describes him as an all loving being I would be fine with such a beings existence and would really have no reason to be afraid. Such a being should understand my mindset and accept me for who I am.
He does indeed, He accepts our free will to act as we decide, and in case of us turning our backs to Him, He will just leave us alone - but, we Christians know this condition as "Hell". While you are here, you have your free will to turn towards or against God, and if you will die while your soul won't accept Him as an all-loving being, you won't meet Him.
There are denominations of Christianity who believe that it's deeds that get you into heaven, if there really was an afterlife I would be all for it, even if eternity became unbelievably boring.
Well, basically it's the right position, if you do good and if you don't place guilt on your conscience with bad deeds, you can go to Heaven even if you have never heard of God existing. About eternal afterlife - I can't say what will be in there, I can say Christians believe in it, and God promised it.
Scientist tell how old a fossil is by what layer of earth is found in.
Wrong, there are other methods to determine the age of a fossil, like measurement of 14C concentration, or other long-term instabile isotopes, there can be more, I'm just unaware of them.
the CDC is a highly reliable, government entity.
See, the government driven scientific organizations, especially in medicine and pharmacy, are currently the place where popular exploits lead to huge money for the drug developers, so these can be (but not always are) biased. I have a source of government-independant scientific research, available in Russian,
here, that states otherwise, and has evidential proof in forms of families cured from infertility diagnosed in professional clinics.
Btw, you fail math. 5e-6 is scientific notation. It is written as 5x10^-6, which is significantly smaller then 5.
You have probably failed at reading. I say "
ores of diameter 5e-6 m", where "m" stands for meters, and explained as "5 micrometers". Be careful with "fail" statements please.