Well there you have it, you don't understand how a free market works.
So by saying that CEOs sit on their at *** smoking a $3 000 pack of cigars, that means I have no idea how a free market works?
That makes perfect sense.
The problem is we rely on a government that can only create debt.
How does the government do this? Did the government give out huge loans to people who weren't qualified for it? Did the government charge 30% tax on credit cards? Did the government foreclose thousands of houses across the nation?
I know, it sucks, if only schools could compete with one another.
How is that relevant?
I think they are a rip off.
You just proved that gift cards (companies) are ripoffs. Why spend money on something that you can get for free?
I'm done debating. You should know by now that I don't support bail outs.
Why? Because it proves that companies don't hire workers and that trickle down theory is a bunch of lies?
When they pay their taxes. And that money is for all. NoName, you try to raise a special needs child who requires extensive medical treatment as a single parent while trying to juggle a job.
You try to be a full time student, living by yourself and holding down a minimum wage job.
Make friends, work hard, be smart.
Morality should not be guided by gunpoint. If you think everyone should help each other, forcing them to pay is not the answer. It causes debt, monopolies, and increased market prices since government kills competition.
You just proved that gift cards (companies) are ripoffs. Why spend money on something that you can get for free?
Gift cards are a rip off, so I don't buy them. Nobody is forcing me to buy that gift card.
I'm done debating. You should know by now that I don't support bail outs.
No, I'm done debating because I'm talking about a free market. I do not support bailouts, yet you insist on acting like I support bailouts. You assume that Americans live in a free market and that I'm defending the way things are, we don't and I'm not. I advocate a true free market.
If I have problems in life, I don't demand a higher authority to take from someone else. I work out my problems. I seek people who can help me and I repay them in one way or another. In a capitalist society with a true free market, everyone has more money in which they can help each other with.
The problem is you completely disregard another's arguments because they do not match your own point of view. You're infuriating to debate with because to you all are inferior, and anything outside your perspective must be wrong. You over simplify and assume too much. Your arguments are simply "Too bad, I did so can you." such standards cannot be held up in a real life situation.
Not everyone is the same, not everyone is capable of dealing with things the way you believe they should be dealt with. We're not advocating that the government should do everything, we're simply supporting a system we believe to be beneficial to a nation. For you to disregard our opinions and beliefs is the height of arrogance.
You and I have discussed this particular issue in the past, so I do not believe I need to remind you of how successful UHC is around the world. Also, UHC does not always cover everything, there is often still a private sector.
The problem is you completely disregard another's arguments because they do not match your own point of view. You're infuriating to debate with because to you all are inferior, and anything outside your perspective must be wrong. You over simplify and assume too much. Your arguments are simply "Too bad, I did so can you." such standards cannot be held up in a real life situation.
Not everyone is the same, not everyone is capable of dealing with things the way you believe they should be dealt with. We're not advocating that the government should do everything, we're simply supporting a system we believe to be beneficial to a nation. For you to disregard our opinions and beliefs is the height of arrogance.
You and I have discussed this particular issue in the past, so I do not believe I need to remind you of how successful UHC is around the world. Also, UHC does not always cover everything, there is often still a private sector.
Bailouts prove that trickle down theory don't work, don't you get it?
Whether you like it or not, it proves it doesn't work. Why? Because the rich don't become so rich that they magically explode and they rain money. You have to force it out of them.
When they pay their taxes. And that money is for all. NoName, you try to raise a special needs child who requires extensive medical treatment as a single parent while trying to juggle a job.
You try to be a full time student, living by yourself and holding down a minimum wage job.
You sir, are why communionsim will always exist. For the worker grows tired of giving his labor to an uncaring master, who cares not if he lives or dies.
OK, there are people like you say who actually deserve help but some people just can't be bothered to work and live off benefits and they don't deserve it.
Universal healthcare is just one step closer to communism, a system where everything is provided to the people who can give no effort into their occupation, leaving the nation in a state of suspended animation, never progressing, and being left in the dust of its rivals
Are you saying that just about every single 1st world country is communist because it believes that all people should have equal rights in some form?
My horse is amazing.
You are just being ignorant in saying that you dont care about other people at all, it's selfish and extremely annoying to read something as ignorant as this.
How does universal have a negative effect on people?
Universal healthcare, we will define it as so: The government provides insurance for people who cannot afford it. At first glance, it looks good - people will be able to have health insurance that they would not have otherwise. However, you're not taking into account what could have been done with the money. If in the taxpayers' hands, that same amount of capital could have been used for other means. Surely there is a huge psychological advantage to this, because we only see the effect that the Universal Healthcare had on people - we never get to see the effect of the extra capital on peoples' lives.
So it stops being a question of "Are the immediate effects of the policy of Universal Healthcare good?" and it becomes the question of "Is the public policy of Universal Healthcare better than private industry?"
Now notice that there is inevitably more waste in the government-run business.
Government has no real incentive to operate in an efficient way like regular business.
Businesses have to compete with other businesses, and in a capitalistic free market, they have to use their own money. Government, however, isn't risking their own money - they're risking the taxpayers.
Inevitably, Government-provided Healthcare has an overall negative effect compared to the alternative: allow a capitalistic free market.
When was the last time you donated money NoName? The people who hold the idea that welfare is wrong because they are using other people's money don't donate for the same reason.
What Noname forgets is, not everyone has the same high paying job he has and can't simply stroll into a doctor's office and pay the $300+ bill right out of pocket.
Actually, you still pay for it, either way, whether it's government-run or run by businesses.