Today I was inspired by someone that we need change. I was the one arguing for it. In this world there are rebels everywhere, people are starting a world-wide revolution. Egypt, Libya, Iraq, I could go on all day. Maybe people are just stupid, scared, or too naive to do anything major other than just kill the ones who are opposed to them. Well, just what do we want? What do we want? Do really need or even want change? Is it a good idea? If it is, what would be the best change? Dictatorship? World-wide independence? Universal unity? I personally believe that a dictatorship with a strong checks and balances system would be the best. What are your thoughts? God, people are idiots anymore. I mean, some of those laws that are in place today have been around before the technological revolution! They mean nothing today. Best choice for weapons? Protest, violence, assassination? Are there more? To sum it up, these are areas of discussion: -Do we need it? -Do we want it? -Ideal government? -Unity or not? -Way to change ideas? -There are more, we can just start with these.
A full scale revolution in the US will probably never make a dictatorship if it was successful. Why would dictatorship be good? The people that are protesting want more rights, not less.
Anyways, because most Americans are idiots and don't really care what happens in politics, I don't think there will be any revolution. I mean the reactions of Americans are so missed placed.
-Guantanamo bay: American reaction: nothing -minority groups having rights: American reaction: outraged -soldiers killing civilians for fun: American reaction: still supporting the troops -Obama, a muslim? American reaction: HE SOCIALIST ZOMG!!
A country that elected Bush twice will not move any time soon.
By the way, fix your "theirs, they'res, and theres."
Yes, Yes... Don't ridicule me.
America and the UN has tried to fit Iraq witha democracy but that is already very corrupt and I'm sure they're trying to do the same with Afghanistan to flush the corrupt government reps out and get fair ones in.
Just a side note: IGNORE THE DICTATORSHIP CRAP People aren't reading how I would take the idea and mold it to create something of a dictatdemocoracip. That's a dictatorship mixed with a democracy. You want details? Look at previously discussed stuff.
I mean the reactions of Americans are so missed placed. -Guantanamo bay: American reaction: nothing -minority groups having rights: American reaction: outraged -soldiers killing civilians for fun: American reaction: still supporting the troops -Obama, a muslim? American reaction: HE SOCIALIST ZOMG!!
Is this factual or just opinion? I think you really need to think about what you are saying. For one example: pretty much everyone I know disagreed with the closing of Gitmo, and everyone I know loved the idea of minorities getting rights. You can't base today off of 1960. I can support the troops, and there is no proof whatsoever that they are killing civvies for fun. That is just a dumb statement. And it's been proven time and again that Obama isn't a muslim.
-Guantanamo bay: American reaction: nothing -minority groups having rights: American reaction: outraged -soldiers killing civilians for fun: American reaction: still supporting the troops -Obama, a muslim? American reaction: HE SOCIALIST ZOMG!!
Although I agree with a majority of those things... I don't like the idea of a terrorist prison being a few hundred miles or less from my home.
The minority rights is more about people blaming things on others. The whole minority thing is just a large blame game.
What would the world be like if we were all the same?
Extremely boring, nothing would happen, and if they did everyone would agree on it and that would be that. Imagine a movie where the main plot is grey.
Extremely boring, nothing would happen, and if they did everyone would agree on it and that would be that. Imagine a movie where the main plot is grey.
A game from this website comes to mind, "Every Day The Same Dream," it was weird, but okay fun-wise.
Is this factual or just opinion? I think you really need to think about what you are saying. For one example: pretty much everyone I know disagreed with the closing of Gitmo, and everyone I know loved the idea of minorities getting rights. You can't base today off of 1960. I can support the troops, and there is no proof whatsoever that they are killing civvies for fun. That is just a dumb statement. And it's been proven time and again that Obama isn't a muslim.
Wow. Are you like living in a cave or something? Talk about proving my point.
1. Not closing G-bay is bad 2. Your saying everyone you know. Come back once you know over 100 000 people. Have you heard something called the tea party? 3. I'm not basing it off 1960. I'm basing it off all the news I hear from time to time. 4. Saying that you don't know that some troops are killing civilians for fun pratically proves my point in the ignorance and stupidity of some (if not most) Americans. 5. No duh, obama isn't a Muslim. You guys would never let someone out of the Christian faith on the seat of power. I was just saying that a lot of Americans actually believed that he was a muslim. Shows how shallow people can be. Not caring about the real important business.
