ForumsWEPRShould Israel Exist

339 55245
zakyman
offline
zakyman
1,627 posts
Peasant

The question is simple. Should Israel exist. I know that this subject is very controversial so I am setting some "ground rules."
1. Because Israel is so tied into Judaism, NO ANTI-SEMETIC COMMENTS
2. Please back up your reasoning with facts
3. Respect other's opinions. I cannot tell you how many times I have been on CNN and seen people flinging mud at each other. BE RESPECTFUL!

I am looking forward to seeing the posts and logic behind the opinions.

For the record, I think it should exist.

  • 339 Replies
sprooschicken
offline
sprooschicken
1,143 posts
Nomad

paarfam it was abit of both, you get what i meant?

i agree imogwai it has the right to exist, there are plenty of otherplaces it could exist, places with less people and places where ist not surrounded by hostile neighbours, even if you are dtermined to have that part of the world it doesnt need to beas big as that

ragnaroka
offline
ragnaroka
27 posts
Nomad

It has the right to exist, like Sproos said, but it's also unfair for the Palestinians.
Maybe only one should exist, or none at all.

sprooschicken
offline
sprooschicken
1,143 posts
Nomad

what exactly do you mean by one or none at all?

master565
offline
master565
4,104 posts
Nomad

actually its been proven that nearly all jews are not semitic


You can't prove something thats an obvious fact (not that their current religious state should really matter)

you think you can take people land just because your ancient book told you some deity said you could have it, thats not how the modern world works


Jews took it from a couple of nations, then people took it from the jews (multiple times), then jews took it back. If this world doesn't work by solving all your problems with war, where have you been living for the past 10000 years?

Besides for that, Israel has made plenty of huge developments in science and medican. The fact that they have to be scared that they could be attacked by terrorist to the point that they need to call in a bomb squad for a bag someone left in a public place, doesn't mean it shouldn't exist. Maybe the countries that make it so violent shouldn't exist...
Paarfam
offline
Paarfam
1,558 posts
Nomad

You can't prove something thats an obvious fact

Of course you can. Take this scenario for example:
"My cup is blue."
"Prove it."
"Look at it!"
Obvious, but possible.
master565
offline
master565
4,104 posts
Nomad

Of course you can. Take this scenario for example:
"My cup is blue."
"Prove it."
"Look at it!"
Obvious, but possible.


Fine, its pointless to prove something obvious.
And your cup is turquoise.
iMogwai
offline
iMogwai
2,027 posts
Peasant

Maybe the countries that make it so violent shouldn't exist...


If you're talking about Palestine, then let me remind you that the reason some of them are violent is because Israel was given a part of their country. And not by those who lived there either.

If having lived there a long, long time ago is enough to justify stealing someone's current home, then would Sweden have the right to just occupy Finland all of a sudden? Or maybe Germany could have most of Europe, at least that one was recent.
redbedhead
offline
redbedhead
341 posts
Nomad

It's the location that is key. Regardless of whether you believe in the religion or not, the historical claim for their religion is still founded in Jerusalem.

Not only that, but iMogwai READ what the two-state solution is before trying to negate it. It's a solution that will work for both sides. Obviously the Israeli people are not going to be moved because they are supported too strongly by the rest of the world. The Palestinians being violent is not the way to go about it. They can object all they want but a solution can be met they simply must recognize Israel as a country as it clearly is. This will give Palestinians their use of the land and still keep an ethnic cultural population for the Israeli's. Read the history of the Jewish people and you will find they have been oppressed a 1000x over what anything the Palestinians are dealing with now. They were going to have to be placed somewhere and it makes the most since to put them where they belong.

iMogwai
offline
iMogwai
2,027 posts
Peasant

This will give Palestinians their use of the land


A part of their land*

Obviously the Israeli people are not going to be moved because they are supported too strongly by the rest of the world.


Some of the rest of the world* (mostly the US)

Read the history of the Jewish people and you will find they have been oppressed a 1000x over what anything the Palestinians are dealing with now.


Two wrongs don't make a right, so what they're doing is still a crime against human rights.

They were going to have to be placed somewhere and it makes the most since to put them where they belong.


It made most sense to put them somewhere that WASN'T ALREADY OCCUPIED. Or at least get the current residents to agree on sharing their country.

It's a solution that will work for both sides.


It will still mean Palestine lost half their country.
master565
offline
master565
4,104 posts
Nomad

If you're talking about Palestine, then let me remind you that the reason some of them are violent is because Israel was given a part of their country. And not by those who lived there either.


I'm talking about most the middle east.

Two wrongs don't make a right, so what they're doing is still a crime against human rights.


How?
iMogwai
offline
iMogwai
2,027 posts
Peasant

I'm talking about most the middle east.


Still, the reason is the same.

How?


What do you mean "how"? You're saying because Jews have been treated bad in the past, they have the right to do whatever they want to do to anyone? How can you even ask that question?
Joe96
offline
Joe96
2,226 posts
Peasant

I watched a documentary in my world geo class about the arab-Israeli conflict called A death in Gaza. It was biased, but only because the journalist was killed by an Israeli soldier. Israel was originally controlled by the Jewish people, but the Palestinians have had it for centuries after. I think that this:
http://lawandsecurity.foreignpolicyblogs.com/files/2010/03/israel-palestine-map1.jpg
is just a bit unfair. I also think it's unnecessary for Israel to have all the weapons and try to intimidate their enemies.

zakyman
offline
zakyman
1,627 posts
Peasant

Joe96, Israel would have been happy to exist with the small specks of land they had in the 1946 map. They were even happier when the UN game them the territory defined by the 1947 map. They were content to keep it that way. Unfortunately, the arab countries could not stand for 2% of their land being given away, so they launched an invasion.
Then, when the Egyptian president closed the Suez Canal, and Israel launched the 6 Day War, their borders expanded yet again. However, what the maps don't show is how much of the land Israel has given away. They used to control the entire Sinai Peninsula, but they gave it to Egypt.

MalKeshar
offline
MalKeshar
108 posts
Jester

I believe Israel should exist because They were there first and it is the home of Jesus and if Israel isn't there, then the book of Revalation will never happen. So yes, Israel should and always will, until the end of time, exist.

master565
offline
master565
4,104 posts
Nomad

What do you mean "how"? You're saying because Jews have been treated bad in the past, they have the right to do whatever they want to do to anyone? How can you even ask that question?


No, but that's not the case.
Showing 16-30 of 339