Gosh when I said dead I meant it would die out over time seeing as it wouldn't breed, sorry for that mess-up, lol.
Lawl, here it is, the root of all anti homosexuality, JEALOUSY!
rofl that might be it.
Next, as I stated before, Gays act like a super uncle, helping to raise family members without being in competition for breeding.
Really? I remembered reading a little about them and all I heard is that they have sex. A Lot. Never heard about any super uncle. Could you give a link, even like, Wikipedia? I searched it up but there wasn't any thing really specific towards Bonobo's when it comes to being gay.
Population control comes to mind.
Well that doesn't make sense, Evolution can't dictate itself based on the success of a species. The act of evolution leads to good or bad population.
So, if, an organism were to be gay, it wouldn't mate, and therefore it's genetic tree or whatever would die out -- and... What?
All I'm saying is, is that if it were to be genetic, it doesn't sound as it is a good mutation/gene.
That means given the choice the gay ram will pick another ram to "ram" together with over a female partner.
But wouldn't that Ram eventually pick a female partner in order to have offspring?
And I know it sounds unfair/stupid to say "Oh they're gay but not quite"
But if you really think about it, you'd see that most animals don't have far too many social customs in comparison to us, so clearly many of them do show homosexual traits, but they're all pretty much bi-sexual. So this shows that yes, in nature, animals do exhibit homosexuality, but not out of some sort of binding genetic preference.
So then, that might lead to us thinking that it isn't a genetic difference that makes one gay.
Which could then bring us back to square one, except, that we'd know it's a choice and not a genetic mutation.
As for the Lesbian Albatrosses.
For one thing, the same-sex pairs appear to do everything male-female pairs do except have sex, and Young isnât really sure, or comfortable judging, whether that technically qualifies them as lesbians or not.
If you read on, Young, the scientist, says it's a human term and not related to the research and blah blah blah.
^ That quotes from this NY Times articleSo I'm not sure if we'd really qualify that as lifelong homosexuality [Seeing as most Albatrosses exhibit a lot of monogamy, which is usually heterosexual, or that almost-lesbian thing]